th comments
said: ""Um, they are preventing traffic from going straight. Glad I don't live 1 street up where all the cars are now reconnecting to the closed route."</..." [read]

Carrie said: "60-90 minutes, but it's all on foot/bus/train/subway..." [read]

Carrie said: "I find this house oddly attractive. It does remind me of Star trek, but I would still like to live in it. The size and layout does make it seem lik..." [read]

Chris said: "Recently I started riding the bike part of the time so its either a 18 mile hour and 20 minute bike ride or a 15 mile 30 to 60 minute car ride... I..." [read]

mmm said: "Call him an idiot, tell him he must be blind and throw an egg. Then turn and wash your hands. Thank god I'm not that guy...." [read]

Hairy Solar Panels Could Result From Nanowire Breakthrough

by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 02. 7.08
Science & Technology

Nanowires solar panels

Solar panels are constantly improving and breaking records. We often hear about new exotic materials and strange shapes, but this could be the weirdest announcement yet: Researchers at McMaster University (coolest name ever) have succeeded in 'growing' light-absorbing nanowires made of high-performance photovoltaic materials on carbon-nanotube fabric. The nanowires are made from exotic materials like gallium arsenide, indium gallium phosphide, etc, and they can absorb more energy from the sun than silicon, allowing the creation of both efficient and flexible solar panels .

The aim is to produce flexible, affordable solar cells composed of Group III-V nanowires that, within five years, will achieve a conversion efficiency of 20 percent. Longer term, he says, it's theoretically possible to achieve 40 percent efficiency, given the superior ability of such materials to absorb energy from sunlight and the light-trapping nature of nanowire structures. By comparison, current thin-film technologies offer efficiencies of between 6 and 9 percent.

Wow. Up to 40% for flexible panels!

But if it is known that the exotic materials used here are more efficient than silicon at converting light into electricity, why aren't they already used? Cost. That's the beauty of the nanowire approach; Each nanowire is 10 to 100 nanometers wide and up to five microns long, so very little pricey metal is used, keeping material costs down. Yet because of their shape, they absorb light quite well.

The research team, led by Ray LaPierre, a professor in the university's engineering physics department, has been given three years to achieve its goals--backed by about $600,000 from the Ontario government and private-sector research partner Cleanfield Energy, a Toronto-area developer of wind and solar technologies.

Best of luck to them!

::Flexible, Nanowire Solar Cells

See also: ::New Solar Panels Produced at Less Than $1 Per Watt, ::40% Efficient Solar Cells: They Are Being Used Back On Earth, ::Holographic Solar: New Method of Concentrating Sunlight Could Be Cheaper, ::Screen-Printed Solar Cells Come in a Variety of Colors and Patterns, Ideal for Building

Comments (18)

Are the panels more fragile? I guess they can find a way to protect the nanowire layer somehow.. Doesn't need to be exposed to air..

jump to top James says:

Hmm, increased surface area.

I wonder if thin film solar panels are translucent and could be stacked?

vsk

jump to top vsk says:

Great. Cheap, efficient solar is here . . . again. Why is it that every other day there is some fantastic new solar breakthrough that has the potential to revolutionize the industry, but none of them ever translate into affordable solar cells people can actually buy?

jump to top But when can I buy it? says:

vsk: you should do some searching for multi band gap PV and holographic solar collectors.

jump to top J450N says:

Only problem some experts think there is only a 10 year supply at current levels of usage of some of these rare elements such as indium. Miracles that will allow 6 billion people to consume the same amount of energy as we do today are hard to find.

jump to top Richard Campbell says:

Actually, Indium is the 61st most abundant substance on Earth, and the talks about "10 years left" are considered to be scaremongering.

But even if that's true, a new breakthrough means that we can replace it with graphene, which is so abundant it's not funny.

jump to top Anonymous says:

the aim is to produce... could....theoretically possible...

There is an enormous difference between producing a lab sample and a useful product, which is why there are frequent announcements of new material, and so few of shipping products.

From the link:

"It's still early days for McMaster, which in prototypes has only achieved low efficiencies--"where silicon PV was in the 1950s," says LaPierre. But he's optimistic that the higher-efficiency materials and the approach chosen will get results.

jump to top james blit says:

Everything starts in the lab, that's no argument against it.

jump to top Anonymous says:

It is a great example of how important shape is for function, and optimization.

The exotic metals used do give this a somewhat limited market, and it would be nice to see some serious research using more 'life friendly' materials that take a cue about the 'hairy shape'.

Maybe look to polar bear hairs that direct and capture light?

Fun post.

jump to top Tim McGee [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Anyone else notice how much it looks like grass? The kind you cut with a lawnmower. Science imitates nature.

jump to top ffbj says:

This is great! All the solar panels I've bought eventually broke from wind and storm damage! I see this as one more step toward very durable panels!


:D

Mike
CIO - NeverBeFiredAgain.com

ALL WELL AND GOOD BUT WHAT HAPPENS TO THE NANOPARTICLES AND EXOTIC PARTICLE COMPOSITION WHEN IT IS RELEASED INTO THE EARTH OR SCRAPPED INTO A WASTE DUMP. SHOULDN'T WE BE CONSIDERING THE WHOLE LIFE CYCLE OF THESE NEW INVENTIONS AND HOW IT ULTIMATELY CAN CYCLE BACK INTO ADVERSE CONDITIONS FOR THE EARTH AND HUMAN HEALTH?

jump to top PJ says:

you make a valid point there PJ, but what's more pressing is the way that you use all caps to say it. :P


is there a way to .. make a tree generate electricity? ...

jump to top Piriya says:

So why is McMaster the coolest name for a University ever? I have a certain personal interest since I did my undergrad in civil engineering at this fine establishment. Anyway, neat looking technology from what is consistently ranked as one of the top three research schools in Canada.

jump to top John says:

One way to get a tree to make energy is to burn it. McMasters is like a McMansion, you just drive thru and they hand you your degree, I guess. It looks like a green roof... How long are those fibers? I wonder if we can get grass to make energy...

jump to top stephanie says:

I, for one, am always thrilled by new advances in the solar energy area. I have a friend, however, who has worked in the energy area, and is always a skeptic. I emailed this to him and he came back with how will it track?

How will it track, does anyone know? That, at this time, is a major expense in the power distribution system. I wonder if anyone is working on a solar tracking system that is like the sunflower, alway pointing at the sun?

jump to top Ides_oMarch [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Fascinating stuff. Another area where solar has a lot of potential, especially in the so-called third world, is solar ovens.

Google Answers had a terrific summary of the current uses of solar cooking, and the future prospects for various technologies:

http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=314366
Solar Cooking

Worth a look!

jump to top david says:

According to my knowledge, highest convert rate for silicon panel is 20%, for CIGS it is 12%, what's this solar panel made from? It can get 40% rate, incredible.

jump to top Solar guy says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads