th comments
Michael Long said: "There's also the possibility that the Fiesta could, in effect, make all of their other cars look bad in comparison. "But, why does THIS ca..." [read]

said: "The EPA's ridiculous regulations have kept diesel's out of the US for years. The American government is at fault here. === authors' respons..." [read]

Mark Kiernan said: "I am truly touched by the great work people are doing around the world for the sake of the Earth and for Animals. It breaks my heart when I hear t..." [read]

Progressive Penguin said: "Hostility. I deeply and sincerely hope that Phoenix, Zap, Tesla and others bury GM and Ford. I will dance a jig and shoot off firecrackers..." [read]

Emily said: "This is why I make all of my own baked goods. That and an allergy to artificial preservatives. :-D..." [read]

Depressed by Your SUV's Horrible Fuel Efficiency? Turn Off the Onboard Computer

by Michael Graham Richard, Gatineau, Canada on 02.14.08
Cars & Transportation

csm-cartoon-mpg-wallet-01.jpg
Credit: The Christian Science Monitor/Bennett

Overheard on a discussion forum about big Toyota SUVs, from someone who bought a Scangauge II trip computer: "I never realized that I average 10 mpg. Even if I barely touch the gas to get up to speed slowly it drops to around 4 to 6 mpg. Cruise control will hold me steady at 12 on a flat road at 60mph".

He got all kinds of advice, some of it quite depressing can be summarized as "If knowing your crappy fuel efficiency makes you mad, turn that thing off man. You cannot change it so don't get so bummed!"

Thankfully, other posters on the forum had better advice, including how to learn from the feedback given by the ScanGauge and tips on how to drive more efficiently.

Any TreeHugger readers have similar experiences or know people that do? Were you shocked to learn your vehicle's real efficiency? Did an onboard computer teach you how to drive better? Please let us know in the comments below.

Thanks to MetroMPG on the Ecomodder Forums for pointing out this funny and sad thread on the Toyota FJ Cruiser forums.

See also: ::We Want Fuel Economy Feedback in All Cars

Comments (11)

I have thought for some time that all new vehicles should have MPG meters that cannot be turned off.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Those simple instant/average displays like the ones in the Sequoia, Grand Caravan, Grand Cherokee we've had over the years are next to useless, though.

The consumption graph in my Prius, though? I was just thinking how useful it would be in any car. 5-minute averages for the past 30 minutes along with a running average and an Instant MPG bar is the perfect combination for achieving MPG bliss.

jump to top Marc Sketchler says:

I sympathize with this guy. I feel the same way when my Civic Hybrid gauge gets below 45 mpg....

jump to top Spike says:

I didn't know that kind of additional onboard computer exist. That's great..... except my 1994 Renault Super5 is compatible with it :-D ... Otherwise, I would have been interrested to buy it.

However, I calculate my car's fuel efficiency very often. When the speed is stabilized on highways at 60mp/h, I get around 52MPG, and when I'm driving in town, I get around 28MPG, which is not bad for a 15 year old car.
I really changed my way of driving since I'm trying to get the lower MPG as possible with my car, it's like a game ;-) .

Here are some tips I can give you from my experience

Accelerations consume a lot of fuel, so my foot is really "light" on the throttle pedal (as long as it's not dangerous for others of course ! safety first !)

My car has manual gears, so I can "disconnect" my engine from wheels, which is really useful when I know that I'm going to stop in few meters (I'm anticipating a traffic light, etc..), so I use the cinetic energy to stop slowly, which, by the way, is saving a little my brakes. Or, I'm doing that if the road fall (if it's falling to fast, I use my brake-engine and my brakes, again, safety first).

If I have to summerize, I would tell : Drive smooth, that's the best way to save your car (to keep it a long time) and to save fuel as well.

jump to top Fred says:

I actually choose a car based on how bad the mileage is. I feel that by using more gas that I am contributing to the economy better than you fools that get 20+mpg. If I spend my money then someone else will get some to spend too. Besides, how in the hell are you going to go 0-60 in under 5 seconds with a POS car.

jump to top Pablo says:

"I actually choose a car based on how bad the mileage is. I feel that by using more gas that I am contributing to the economy better"

I know you're just trolling, but I'll bite: What you said is actually incorrect. Higher efficiency and productivity is what helps the economy grow for the long term, not waste.

By doing more with less, you actually help the economy quite a bit, because you reduce your opportunity cost and can use what you have more productively.

jump to top Jay J. says:

Oh, dear: Pablo and Jay J. aren't about to start the old Keynesian vs neoclassical growth model debate again, are they? I thought that becoming a pinko-commie-treehugger would allow me to escape my undergraduate economics classes! :)

jump to top jajohnson [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

I'm really disappointed when I use more than 25cents of electricity to go 40km on the EVT scooter...

jump to top Bryan says:

"Those simple instant/average displays...are next to useless..."

I disagree. For those of us who pay attention to our consumption, perhaps, but for most drivers who haven't been, I think watching that number plument every time they bury their foot in the right pedal is just what they need to connect their actions to the consequences.

jump to top Anonymous says:

you are not doing anything for the environment by driving a usless vehicle and pushing treehugging on everyone. You need to realize that speeding and all the big vehicles are nothing to sitting in traffic. That is the worst on mileage. As for that I hope California fals into the ocean and all the tree huggers are on it.

jump to top Anonymous says:

All right, enough is enough, you're all whining like a bunch of small children over these criminally orchestrated gas prices. I said it a few months ago that gas prices would rise to five dollars a gallon before my 53rd birthday. In addition, according to my calculations it's just .85 cents away from being five dollars a gallon now. Diesel fuel is already way over four dollars a gallon, and the angry truckers are bitching a blue streak too. As a self claiming poor scientist, I too feel the pain at the pump. However, perhaps these high fuel prices are a godsend telling us all that it's now the right time to change to something far better. There is no need to dramatically change anything on that nice big fat luxury car or that wonderful gas guzzling SUV either That internal combustion according to my own calculations is not going anywhere anytime soon. That's right it's here to stay for many more years to come. We simply need to do a little reverse engineering, while gas
prices remain so astronomically high. The overall key for solving that high price fuel dilemma requires no rocket science at all; we simply apply a little logic to the equation.

In conclusion, wind turbines solar panels and other forms of so-called free energy are not the answer. Fusion could arrest the problem temporarily; however, that form of energy is too unpredictable. No as gas, prices continue to skyrocket; now is the time to introduce a new form of power. Call it the next generation in the internal combustion engine process if you will, however once the highly advanced application is completed and ready for testing, I say woe too big bad oil.
Professor West

jump to top Professor West says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads