th comments
Kylie Wrath said: "Whether or not leather is a product or by-product is irrelevant: there are tons of people who buy it regardless. I think the fact that this company..." [read]

thespyofcharles said: "hmm... perhaps i shall reconsider my excessive gift packaging gag i was planning... or maybe do it out of old boxes that would otherwise simply hav..." [read]

mike said: "I think it is humerous at the record losses posted at GM. They really had the jump on technoligy with the EV1 but decided to put all their effort i..." [read]

Louise White said: "I have a 2002 Prius with 143,000 miles on it. Recently I started checking on my trade in value for a new Prius. Every sales person told me that I..." [read]

Lori said: "Regardless of whether or not this "soup" exists, the fact is that we need to all be aware and responsible for how we treat this planet. We have to..." [read]

Ohio Prods Ontario To Act On Great Lakes Wind Power

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 01.18.08
Business & Politics

lake%20ontario%20canada%20wind%20power.jpg

Authorities in the Canadian Province of Ontario are reported to be preparing to lift a longstanding moratorium on development of offshore wind projects in the Ontario portion of the Great Lakes. Wind industry sources confirmed to the Toronto Star that the moratorium's end is imminent. (Toronto visible on NW shore of Lake Ontario, pictured.)

Offshore wind energy, while typically associated with ocean projects, offers significant opportunities in the Great Lakes. According to one study by Helimax Energy Inc., the strong and consistent winds typically over the lakes could generate up to 47,000 megawatts of clean electricity – nearly double Ontario's existing power capacity.

Earlier, the wisdom of the November-2006 announced moratorium had been called into question when it was discovered that some U.S. states, such as Ohio, were actively moving forward with offshore projects in Lake Erie despite the Ontario policy.

Why a moratorium? The usual impetus: property values.

"The biggest issue to most residents was how it affected their view of the lake, which is really only the last natural view we have in our area."
Two proposed projects have been on hold since the moratorium began.
Toronto Hydro Corp. has considered an offshore wind project in Lake Ontario near the Scarborough Bluffs. That wind farm would have a capacity of up to 200 megawatts.

...A more ambitious project by Trillium Power Energy Corp. would involve 140 turbines erected along a shallow stretch of Lake Ontario, about 15 kilometres offshore from Prince Edward County. The wind farm would have a capacity of 710 megawatts, the largest in Ontario.

Important Note: Lake Ontario is bordered on the South by the US State of New York, which also has a hand to play in the wind power game. However, as shown in this bathymetric map of the central part of Lake Ontario, with the Ontario/New York border running east to west across the middle, Ontario has the 5 aces position - a vast area of shallow lake basin far enough off shore as to not be visible. Go Ontario!

middle%20of%20lake%20ontario%20bathymetry.jpg

See also: Greenpeace Gets It Right: More Wind Power In Erie A Good Idea

Via::The Toronto Star, "Ontario to approve Great Lakes wind power" Image credit::Federal Publications, Inc., "Lake Ontario Satellite Poster" AND NOAA, "Great Lakes Data Rescue Project - Lake Ontario Bathymetry"

Comments (2)

A minor point, Ohio borders mainly on Lake Erie, not Lake Ontario. Yet, Ontario borders both lakes.

jump to top Bill says:

"Why a moratorium? The usual impetus: property values. 'The biggest issue to most residents was how it affected their view of the lake, which is really only the last natural view we have in our area.'"

That doesn't necessarily speak of property values. It seems to me that the quote is about the aesthetics of the lake, which certainly has an affect of property values but is a reasonable objection in itself. Shouldn't preserving nature itself be worth considering? After all, we need to green what we do in large part because we decided, in modern times, that the only value nature has is use-value for humans. Simply greening nature's utility doesn't seem like much of a solution to me.

jump to top jajohnson [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads