most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Andrea Kay Smith said: "ON CHARACTER: When I was young, I ignored bullies. When I became a vegetarian, in high school, I did the same thing and just laughed off the..." [read]

Eric said: "I commute each day for 15 minutes on my Strida, which has a belt drive, and the main benefit I get from it is clean pants. It takes about 3 petal r..." [read]

dış cephe said: "thanks...." [read]

Willy Bio said: "Well, Mr. Smarty, by your own admission, you already have. So please, enlighten us...." [read]

scott said: "The powers that be will allow no change to occur. They are what needs to change. It will likely take violent revolution to do so. We have h..." [read]

Living With Water Extremes: A Juxtaposition Of Design Responses

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 01.30.08
Design & Architecture

maasbommel%20houses.jpg

Many people live with the daily fear of not having enough water. Take Atlanta, Georgia USA, for example. Atlanta is an inverse Atlantis. Until recently, Atlanta was legendary for rapid growth without limits. Its citizens ever willing to live with the misery of traffic jams, the Atlanta area now faces the prospect of economic decline for lack of water, as well as overcrowded highways.

The drought-adaptive measures talked about most in Atlanta area seem superficial by comparison to what's happening in Holland, where the threat of climate change-amplified floods have inspired a community scale design change.

A Netherlands-based architecture firm, with government support, are designing and building communities with homes that float (as pictured above). These are not really houseboats parked in suburban-like rows (although the basement is water proof and boat-like, and the whole affair could be made to float to a new setting).

Steel pillars keep the flood-adaptive buildings horizontally stable during the presence of floodwaters. But, rather like the float inside a modern toilet tank, the homes move freely, up and down. See early TreeHugger coverage of this design approach: "Floating Eco-Homes In The Netherlands"

bluehouse_450.jpg

Obviously this is not a solution for buildings more than one or two stories high; but for a rural or what in the US would be called an "ex-urban" development, it is fine. Might make more sense than a government buyout and relocation such as the the US Army Corps of Engineers most unimaginatively favors.

blockquote%20copy.gifThe inevitable rise in sea level that comes with climate change is going to make it increasingly difficult to control flooding in low-lying Holland. But instead of cursing their fate, architects are designing a new Holland that will float on water, and the Dutch government seems willing to try out the scheme. Holland has made other countries begin to question, too. Who says you have to live on dry land?...

blockquote%20copy.gif"The whole idea is, in our designs, we should always take into account what will happen when there's an extreme event," Zevenbergen says. In the past, the Dutch only built homes in places where dikes made flooding unlikely...

blockquote%20copy.gif"The next step: we not only make the house floating, but we make the complete garden floating," Olthuis says.

For the emergency readiness kit, the residents might want to add a few fishing rods.

Meanwhile over in Texas USA, local elected officials seem to have gotten the "think ahead" message about water resources and growth. Take this example.

blockquote%20copy.gifThe Lone Star Groundwater Conservation District has notified water suppliers that they must reduce their use of the county aquifer system by 30 percent by 2015, with a concern for anticipated growth in their areas through 2045 and preliminary plans for an alternative water source.

See also: On the Stands: Innovative Home Fall 2007 AND Villa Näckros: Swedish Floating Prefabs

Via::NPR, All Things Considered, "Dutch Architects Plan for a Floating Future" Image credits::NPR, Maasbommel Houses AND WaterSecretsBlog, "Texas County Seeking Drinking Water Sources for Future Growth"

Comments (1)

Might make more sense than a government buyout and relocation such as the the US Army Corps of Engineers most unimaginatively favors.

It might make more sense, if the people living in the floating houses are willing to give up things like permanent road access and sewer connections. If they don't mind rowing home, I don't mind them building this way.

But if they do mind, then relocation is the only thing that makes sense.

=== authors response follows ===
FYI: all utility connections are maintained during the high water period via flexible tubes. People who live in floodplains have the choice of owning or borrowing a boat ride or leaving before the water comes. The point is that their homes will not be destroyed and taxpayers will not have to share the insurance and relo burden created by the traditional approaches.

jump to top Ruben says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads