most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
gmoke said: "There are nearly one million solar/dynamo am/fm/sw radios in Afghanistan distributed by US and NATO forces since before the invasion. These solar/..." [read]

Rich said: "Kashrut is dietary law. Please don't eat the fabric softener. LA: I spent the morning at a Bat Mitzvah reading Leviticus to figure t..." [read]

megan said: "Why not buy a used lunch box? I see them constantly at garage sales and thrift stores for under $5. You can save small jars left over from things l..." [read]

said: "Why the sticker shock? Look at regular- plastic lunchboxes, the kind kids take to school, and you'll see that cost $5-10, just for the box...." [read]

BirdTrouble said: "how does that effect those of us who only eat organic meats???..." [read]

Car on a Stick by Ross Lovegrove

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 01.25.08
Cars & Transportation (cars)

2008-01-25_123055-TreeHugger-lovegrove1.jpg

I mean, it's bad enough that cars clog the roads and consume fuel; when they are not running they need parking lots for storage and don't do anything useful. What the world needs is a solar powered all electric car. On a stick. That way, when you need to park, it frees up ground space. Oh, and once it is up there it acts as a streetlight.

2008-01-25_123357-TreeHugger-lovegrove2.jpg

That is what industrial designer Ross Lovegrove thinks.

2008-01-25_123929-TreeHugger-lovegrove3.jpg

The vehicles are designed to carry four passengers plus shopping, which is stored in recesses on the floor. The cars navigate automatically via voice command and satellite navigation.::Dezeen

2008-01-25_123945-TreeHugger-lovegrove4.jpg

2008-01-25_124246-TreeHugger-lovegrove7.jpg

Lovegrove: "So what you have here is a bubble car" very little material, transparent, very human, delicate, gentle, carrying people, democratic for all of us, non-polluting, no noise."

2008-01-25_124601-TreeHugger-lovegrove8.jpg

"Maybe at night you do need a bit of light in the bubble so when you're travelling through a city people can see you. You'd get this lovely low level of these ghostly people, beautiful, just moving through the city" ::CNN

Comments (14)

There's something about that guy that I just love...

jump to top Ross says:

I appreciate the thought process here; I am of the mindset that transportation design should be rethought with more sensibility and care.

However the celebrity-designer carte blanche approach to these kinds of things can often fall from being inspirational to being slightly insipid. To have the world as a captive audience for your creative contributions is no easy task. But to use that visibility for far-fetched solutions to problems that are in fact quite serious is something else entirely. The world, the 1st world for that matter, doesn't 'need' anything. If at all, it needs less. The other two-odd billion people out there who could benefit from cheap, efficient, low energy and highly functional transportation & technology is no laughing matter.
Design can and should be a tool to bring quality of life to everyone, not just the select few who can afford 'designer' things to make life easier.

The solution...use your celebrity to bring attention to these things, beyond just a $100 laptop. Real design talent lies in real solutions to real and immediate problems with real life restrictions. Show me something beyond the level of thinking that a 1st year design student could do and we'll go from there.

jump to top Leon Fitzpatrick says:

Slick. The seating arrangement is pretty anti-social though.

jump to top Albert says:

If Ross Lovegrove's name wasn't attached to this silly car no one would pay any attention to it. It reminds me of freshman-level design work I used to see hanging in the hall at The College for Creative Studies. It would have been nice if he'd spent his time trying to solve a real problem realistically.

The current personal transportation situation is a problem. While this solutions is totally unfeasible, it does have a lot of good ideas behind it. And thats what concepts are about.

Cars of the future will likely be electric or use hydrogen fuel cells. These both allow for the mechanics to be consolidated into a thin heavy base. I think that is reflected here.

Instead of creating more light pollution, wouldn't it be a better idea to plug these things back into the grid when they park and send any surplus electricity that way?

jump to top Ella [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Cool idea. Perhaps they could elevate in front of homes, and become a solarium while parked at home.

Unfortunately no good for a winter city, where these vehicles would get covered in dirty slush.

jump to top SteveL [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

i want some of whatever Dr. Lovegrove is smoking. it must be great if he decided to design the Jetson's car.

jump to top brian says:

to bad that this concept like a lot of others just won't work under any conditions other than a perfectly clean city with lots of sunshine. the fact that our only reasonable way(as of now) to make hydrogen for fuel cell powered cars is still natural gas makes solar powered cars appealing but i am yet to see a design that could realistically be used in a wider range of environments

jump to top Anonymous says:

How does the parked bubblecar takes up less space than the car itself? Any bubblecar parking space would need the same amount of room in order for the car to in position for it to raise itself. I suppose the extra space under the bubblecar could be used once it's been parked, but the safety concerns would probably limit people from using the space below. Moreover, the space could only be used for the limited (and yet unknowable) time the owner wants to remained parked. This seems like a significant problem.

jump to top John says:

How does the parked bubblecar takes up less space than the car itself? Any bubblecar parking space would need the same amount of room in order for the car to in position for it to raise itself. I suppose the extra space under the bubblecar could be used once it's been parked, but the safety concerns would probably limit people from using the space below. Moreover, the space could only be used for the limited (and yet unknowable) time the owner wants to remained parked. This seems like a significant problem.

jump to top John says:

Looks more like a rolling petrie dish to me. No windshield wipers, no safety devices, little to no suspension. Heating and cooling in a mobile greenhouse? Like someone else pointed out, this isn't new. I saw something just like it on 'The Jetsons'... "Meet boy Elroy..."

-Lego

jump to top Legodragonxp [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

When it's rainy or muddy or cruddy, or whatever other kind of #%*@ you drive through, it would drip down on passers by. Nevermind falling fenderbergs.

jump to top james says:

I absolute love this new car idea. I am not only be pleased to use one of those cars but to be part of the realization of such a dream. Congratulations Mr. Lovegrove.

jump to top Vicky Estrada says:

What about wheel chair accessibility with this transportation vision??

jump to top Patrick Gauthier says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads