th comments
Louise White said: "I have a 2002 Prius with 143,000 miles on it. Recently I started checking on my trade in value for a new Prius. Every sales person told me that I..." [read]

Lori said: "Regardless of whether or not this "soup" exists, the fact is that we need to all be aware and responsible for how we treat this planet. We have to..." [read]

Max P said: "Lunar soil (regolith) contains Helium-3, a non-radioactive isotope of Helium which is very rare on Earth. The significance of He-3 is that it can b..." [read]

Truespeak said: "Wind power works. Anyone who says it isn't perfect is correct, but no power generation is perfect, and we still use them all. I'm in the US,..." [read]

Anthony Vicari said: "@weee recycling I fail to see why nuclear should be singled out over coal for failure to plan long term. I mean, chemists predicted the ef..." [read]

How Carbon Saved Earth from Becoming a Big Snowball

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 12. 8.07
Science & Technology

glaciers on greenland
Image courtesy of dsearis

With all the sobering talk of rising greenhouse gas emissions and ocean acidification, it seems hard sometimes to recall that "greenhouse" and "carbon dioxide" weren't always so firmly wedded to the issue of global warming. Indeed, were it not for the greenhouse effect - through which carbon dioxide and other GHGs capture and trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere - life would not have flourished on Earth as it has.

New geological data has shown that Earth came perilously close to being permanently plunged into subfreezing conditions several hundred million years ago - a shift in the planet's climate that was only averted through the presence of carbon. This has lent credence to the so-called the "snowball Earth hypothesis," which alleges that the planet required millions of years to fully recover from such freezes - and that it did so with the help of atmospheric carbon dioxide originating from volcanic eruptions.

The University of Toronto team, led by W. Richard Peltier, discovered that carbonates in the sea bottom helped prevent the freezing conditions from overtaking the entire planet - creating a "slushball Earth". Diminishing global temperatures facilitated the oceans' uptake of oxygen; the excess gas then reacted with carbonates, releasing carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere - spurring a bounceback in global temperatures.

This helped stabilize climactic conditions - preventing the planet from entering a permanent frozen phase. According to Alan Jay Kaufman, a geologist at the University of Maryland, it is these feedback systems that should theoretically prevent the planet from undergoing a period of disproportionate global warming. However, because this stabilization process normally takes place over several thousand years, Kaufman notes it will likely have no impact during our lifespans.

Via ::ScienceNOW: Did Carbon Save Earth From a Deep Freeze? (news website)

See also: ::Global Warming: Still Happening, ::Melting Ice Cap Triggering Earthquakes, Endangering Wildlife, ::The Melting Iceberg: A Constant Reminder of Global Warming

Comments (3)

35 years ago I was taught that 100,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile and a half of ice and the glacier cover all of Canada up to Mercer PA. I read a couple of years ago 100,000,000 million years ago dinosaurs roamed Antartica and Greenland. The tetonic plates moved put they were still towards the poles. European Ice ages have come and gone in the last 2000 years. I have yet to read an explanation of the changes of the earths temperature. Inquiring minds want to know!

jump to top Mac-101 says:

It's also pointed out in "The World WIthout Us" that the carbon we're pouring into the atmosphere will delay the inevitable next ice age. They happen in cycles, and it's been 11,000 years now.

Of course, it's destroying our climate in the process.

jump to top Adam says:

Of course carbon dioxide is NOT "destroying the environment" (what a silly thing to say) but I'm gratified to see the Ice Age cycles referenced here. We're definitely heading towards a new one based on comparison of current conditions to past ones (as near as we can intuit from the evidence, anyway).

jump to top Steven Woodcock says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads