th comments
laptop battery said: "thanks,Other small improvements in battery life may be gained by the ability to turn off USB ports individually to save power. ..." [read]

Badnewsz said: "Hi all! I am happy to this site! I want to buy a scwhinn izip but want to upograde it from stock. I have read most people put it up to ..." [read]

batteries said: "Thank you for this outstanding article.I thought Centrino was the best technology for laptop battery performance. ..." [read]

lilyanne said: "this is great. i hope that more major coffee companies purchase this product for their company. think GREEN people..." [read]

Green SAHM said: "This just seems nuts to me. My daughter's elementary school just had new bike racks put in. They allow 3rd grade and up to ride bikes to school. I ..." [read]

Green Stats: 241,000

by Collin Dunn, Corvallis, OR, USA on 12.18.07
Cars & Transportation

green-stats-fuel-efficiency.jpg

241,000 -- the number of additional jobs create nationwide, by 2020, that would result from requiring automakers to meet a fleetwide average of 35 miles per gallon (MPG) by 2018.

23,900 -- the increase in jobs in the automotive sector alone that would result from the above action.

$37 billion -- the amount of money consumers would save, in 2020 alone, from the increased MPG requirements.

1.6 million -- the amount of oil, in barrels per day, that the US would save, by 2020, by enacting such action.

::Union of Concerned Scientists via ::Environment and Energy Study Institute and ::Gristmill

Comments (8)

"$37 billion -- the amount of money consumers would save, in 2020 alone, from the increased MPG requirements."

To make that statement requires that you forecast what the price of gas is going to be in 2018....in other words that statement is complete bull.

jump to top Mike says:

"$37 billion -- the amount of money consumers would save, in 2020 alone, from the increased MPG requirements."

To make that statement requires that you forecast what the price of gas is going to be in 2018....in other words that statement is complete bull.

jump to top Mike says:

'that statement is complete bull'

Yes, indeed. With current increase, it is going to be much higher than 37 billion.

jump to top Anonymous says:

hmmm, complete bull... or the result of extensive research done by an institute that exclusively studies energy and the environment.... what's with the instant negativity on these comments? Do a little bit of research to back up your accusation.

jump to top thrive says:

Why don't they design a car that charges as you drive. They have new styles of solar cells, and most RV's charge there battery systems with wind power. 120 miles then needs a charge doesn't work if you need to go 600 miles.

jump to top Janette says:

Unless it was "at least $37 billion" and was based on today's oil prices. I think one thing we can be certain of is that by 2018, oil will be considerably more expensive than it is today.

jump to top Anonymous says:

You're right Mike. We should never do anything unless we know exactly how its going to work out. Thats what innovation is all about. And I'm sure gas prices will fall by 2018 right?

I haven't checked the U of CS and EESI projections, have you?

jump to top Pat says:

i'm a bit curious how they came up with these numbers myself, but more along the lines of number of cars on the road, i guess if you say we have 'x' million more cars on the road and they're, on average, getting 10 more miles a galon, we have 10x savings. kind of like the more you shop during a clearance sale the more you save.

jump to top e says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads