most popular:
66 Gas Saving Tips



most popular:
7 Best Electric Scooters


th comments
Anthony said: "These are really cool. I'd live in one. Of course, while I admire off-grid living because it allows you to k now exactly where your power and..." [read]

Anthony said: "Well Chris, I don't know about sailing ships, but I do expect we'll see nuclear merchant ships if the price of diesel stays high and goes higher. W..." [read]

Anthony said: "I assume that by saying the higher numbers are more difficult to recycle, we mean some combination of more labor, more energy, and more toxicity is..." [read]

Anthony said: "@clipmedia: I'm sure, but the whole "cars are inherently bad, regardless of how we design, build, or power them" argument is stale and doesn't hold..." [read]

Anthony said: "The power efficiency of a computer is unrelated to the brand. Each part comes from a different manufacturer no matter who assembled them, so you ha..." [read]

FutureGen's Plan to Bring CCS to Illinois in Trouble?

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 12.26.07
Science & Technology

concept futuregen plant

Well, that was fast: It was little more than a week ago that we'd heard that a government-industry alliance was getting set to pump $1.76 billion into a so-called "clean coal" power plant in Illinois; now, because of cost issues, the DOE seems to be backpedaling on its commitment.

Earth2Tech's Craig Rubens reports that:

"The statement has blindsided FutureGen’s carbon capture and sequestration hopes. The release says the DoE has been discussing the project’s cost with FutureGen for months. DoE wants a reassessment of the projected cost overruns and wants to see a “restructuring” in FutureGen."

This wouldn't be the first time FutureGen has gotten bogged down in technical and financial issues. Earlier this year, a group of influential scientists hit out at the federal government for the slow progress being made in funding carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) trials, singling out FutureGen for being too little, too late (their analysis, The Future of Coal, can be found here).

According to the government's estimates, the Illinois plant would've been able to produce 275 MW of electricity by 2013 - with only 10% of the carbon dioxide emitted by modern coal-fired plants. The government-funded plant would've been one of 12 proposed plants in the works using the integrated gasification-combined cycled (IGCC) technology.

In a recent interview, Mike Mudd, CEO of FutureGen, said that "every month of delay can add $10 million to the project's cost, solely due to inflation" - hardly small change considering that the project has already been delayed numerous times since its original inception.

All eyes will be on the DOE next month when it (hopefully) deliberates on the project's future status.

Via ::The Christian Science Monitor: FutureGen to build 'clean coal' plant in Illinois (newspaper), ::Earth2Tech: Future Cloudy For FutureGen? (blog)

See also: ::Carbon Sequestration Financials Look Weak, ::Southern Illinois To Sequester Wisconsin's C02, ::Coal: Our Nation’s Workhorse, ::Report Re-characterizes “Clean Coal” Program: Black As Ever

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads