most popular:
Green Your TP



most popular: i MiEV to Launch Early


most popular:
The Micro Compact Home


th comments
Buckwad said: "All that fish, Angelina!! What about Mercury? WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN...." [read]

Anthony said: "I am curious what will happen, what will be said when almost every nation who agreed to the kyoto protocol has failed to live up to their obligatio..." [read]

Anthony said: "Do you think once the "good stuff" is good, coal will get expensive enough that we stop thinking of it as the cheapest alternative? If it gets more..." [read]

Anthony said: "No, the path is simpler than that. We are seeing the first step: hybrid cars. They are gradually giving way to serial hybrids, PHEV. These will lik..." [read]

Mark Kiernan said: "Why is it that some guy with a lot of free time, and a passion for electric bikes or cars can make something like this himself, while a large multi..." [read]

Cleaner Burning Engines: Thanks To Lasers

by Tim McGee, Helena, MT, USA on 12. 9.07
Cars & Transportation

exhaust.jpg

What happens when we change our fuel, but not our engines? Well, nobody really knows the details, and that's the problem. We have seen that today's combustion engines cause a wide range of pollution, and as we consider the switch from diesel to bio-diesel or gasoline to ethanol it would be wise if we knew what type of pollution this change will create. Now, thanks to Dutch researcher Bas Bougie we can more easily evaluate and tune our engines to reduce pollution.

Bougie devised a technique using Laser Induced Incandescence (LII) to look at the soot formation inside an engine. Basically, LLI is shooting a laser into a volume of air with soot, as the laser heats up the soot to a high temperature it becomes incandescent. You can then measure the incandescence and determine the size and amount of soot production for any given system. With this technique it may be possible to tune our engine designs and fuel parameters to meet very low emissions requirements- no more excuses.

::Eureka Alert

Comments (1)

Helpful technologies are always theoretically available, it's just that manufacturers oppose mandates for them. Remember how car makers whined about how seatbelts and airbags would bankrupt them? It took the demands of consumers, who started defecting to more safety-oriented foreign cars, for US auto companies to finally agree. And now consumers are accustomed to foreign brands, and imports take a huge chunk of domestic demand while American auto companies are on life support.

Now the Prius is doing the same thing, even with an historically low dollar.

How ironic. If the Federal Government had been more aggressive about regulation in the 70s, the US auto companies would be in better financial shape today. People have to start demanding Congress take a leadership role in making products more efficient.

jump to top rob says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads