most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
cb8888 said: "Thanks to Graydon , its a terrible story but the rush for sensationalism of seems to have overrun the facts. Even if ice breakers were available no..." [read]

said: "Technically Venice has been flooded for years. The buildings are built upon limestone which is resistant to erosion from water. However, the wate..." [read]

quikboy said: "Great! Just in time for the Summer Olympics! They should do this in Houston too!..." [read]

Eric said: "I'm in full support of the use of reusable bottles over disposable. However, I do question the wisdom of the following line... "Using paper..." [read]

Mackenzie said: "Larry: I recall the Gondola tour guide saying they have boats going up and down the river treating it in-place. The Gondola tour guid..." [read]

Argentina Might Limit Tourism to Antarctica

by Paula Alvarado, Buenos Aires on 12. 3.07
Business & Politics (news)

explorer_cruise_antarctica.jpg

(Picture: Explorer cruise in Antarctica, via El Nuevo Dia newspaper) About a week ago, the cruise ship MS Explorer with Liberian flag sank in Antarctica leaving a diesel stain five kilometers of diameter. The cruise ship transported 100 travelers and 54 staff members that were rescued, and had 185 thousand liters of diesel and 1200 liters of gas oil. Now 1500 meters deep, until last Friday, authorities claimed the ship continued to spill fuel into the waters.

A few days later, concern started to raise in both Argentina and Chile, because specialists worried petrol may damage more than 2000 penguins who go through the place where the stain is every year to reach the Ardley island, where they have their reproduction process. Their journey to the island usually takes place this time of the year.

This unfortunate incident has finally drawn the attention of Argentine authorities about the impact of tourism to the delicate region of Antarctica and the National Environment Secretary, Romina Picolotti, has announced that the government might limit permissions for tourism to the area.

Via BBC in Spanish.

“This is a wake up call for tourism activity. We should not have a fuel stain floating (in Antarctica), so now we’ll work in order to limit the tourist flow to the region, which doubled in the last years”, declared Picolotti. According to her, this Argentine summer more than 30 thousand visitors are supposed to arrive to Antarctica.

“Antarctica’s purpose is not tourist activity. We nations have to carry on a bigger effort to be more strict in these kinds of control (to tourism)”, said the Secretary. She also announced the national government will start legal action against the cruise company that operated the ship for “environmental damage”.

According to Picolotti, the stain is spreading to the open sea, which will favor its evaporation, since it is “light fuel”.

Other authorities claim that even though the whole amount of fuel the ship transported has not been spilled yet, the corrosion the ship will suffer in deep sea may cause future complications, since it is 1500 meters deep now.

The ship sank 1200 kilometers south of Punta Arenas (Chile) and about 26 miles of 25 de Mayo Island (Antarctica).

::Original article BBC Spanish ::Terra article (in Spanish) ::La Nacion Chile article (in Spanish) ::El Nuevo Dia article (in Spanish)

Comments (6)

1500 kilometers (932 miles) deep?

jump to top Kent says:

might be a better argument to limit tourism to ships from countries with stricter safety standards than Liberia...

jump to top nero42 says:

Hi Kent! It was my bad, I think I got confused with the stain size numbers. Fortunately I was corrected by one of our editors!

Cheers, Paula


jump to top Paula says:

1500 meters is what the article states. Where did you get 1500 kilometers from?

jump to top Steve says:

The ship owner, Bruce Poon Tip, is supposedly quite the pal of Al Gore - you would think that running a large, diesel powered, ship into the pristine environment – for bored tourists no less - would be considered bad form. Greenwashing at its worst.

Sinking it from sheer (fill your fav word here - incompetence is my pick) is even worse form and now the entire area is polluted and will be for years to come. The time has come to rethink the access to these waters. No matter who your buddy may be today.

jump to top Don says:

The ship SUNK not sinked

---
FROM WRITER:

Thanks, I corrected it though I believe it was "sank" instead. Best.

jump to top Michael Nobel says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads