most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Preserve said: "I'm on track with the used lunch box perspective. Why make more and more and more lunch boxes when there are already millions of perfectly good lu..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "Hey Raiyn, Good for you, you are in the tiny minority. My problem is with eco-happy-hippie-nitwits who think "oh, its metal, I can toss in..." [read]

yoshhash said: "I am not Jewish, and would barely consider myself "religious". I also hang dry 90% of the time, but I thought this article was great- I will certa..." [read]

Albert said: "Petro-dollar talking. Wise investments for when the oil flow will reduce or dry out. All these will ensure tourists and foreign exchange will keep ..." [read]

Raiyn said: "Willie, so easily upset. It just so happens that my local steel recycler accepts bike chains as does the county. The county magnetically sep..." [read]

1 GW of Organic Solar by 2017 - The Carbon Trust Aims High

by Sami Grover, Carrboro, NC, USA on 12. 2.07
Science & Technology (solar)

Organic%20Solar.jpg

We’ve looked at the concept of organic solar cells before, and while they are unlikely to reach the operating efficiencies of silicon based PV any time soon, they do offer the potential for substantially cheaper manufacture. Now we hear from the UK that the Carbon Trust, which is already well known for handing out cash to worthy projects, is funding a research project, led by the University of Cambridge's Cavendish Laboratory with The Technology Partnership, to the tune of £5 million (US$10 million) that aims take organic solar cells from the laboratory and on to rooftops. The eventual aim is to have 1 gigawatt of generating capacity installed by 2017. However, the researchers have no intention of replacing conventional silicon-based solar, merely to complement it:

Is organic solar likely to replace silicon, then? Even though the more efficient silicon has an obvious cost penalty, Greenham doesn't think so: "There's going to have to be a lot more PV of all kinds. We want to make it cheap enough to really expand the market."

That view is shared by Professor Paul O'Brien at the University of Manchester. He's been involved with solar cells for more than 20 years, especially those that don't use silicon. "Silicon is made in a foundry and the technology is the same as we use to make silicon chips. That, of course, is far too expensive," says O'Brien, who reckons that solar cells need be no more pricey than high-performance self-cleaning glass. "Get the cost down, and the whole thing becomes viable."

As the twin crises of climate change and dwindling oil reserves unfold, lets hope that more funding bodies step up to the plate to develop real alternatives to fossil fuels, and then set equally ambitious goals for implementing them. ::The Guardian::via site visit::

Comments (1)

That should be complEment...

From Mr Picky

------
Author's Comment:
Oops- thanks Mr Picky. I'll correct that now.

jump to top ncollingridge [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads