most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
cb8888 said: "Thanks to Graydon , its a terrible story but the rush for sensationalism of seems to have overrun the facts. Even if ice breakers were available no..." [read]

said: "Technically Venice has been flooded for years. The buildings are built upon limestone which is resistant to erosion from water. However, the wate..." [read]

quikboy said: "Great! Just in time for the Summer Olympics! They should do this in Houston too!..." [read]

Eric said: "I'm in full support of the use of reusable bottles over disposable. However, I do question the wisdom of the following line... "Using paper..." [read]

Mackenzie said: "Larry: I recall the Gondola tour guide saying they have boats going up and down the river treating it in-place. The Gondola tour guid..." [read]

Wayback Machine 1937: Affordable Modern Prefab

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 11.22.07
Design & Architecture (prefab)

2007-11-22_130208prefab.jpg

Flat roof ready for its green roof installation, corner windows, expandable "grow home" design, integrated furniture and appliances, transformer beds, five hundred bucks (about $15 PSF)- what's not to love? ::Modern Mechanix

Comments (5)

Thanks for posting this advert.

While I doubt any “modern American” would live in a structure so small – it does look like a candidate for a cabin or MIL add-on. In 1937 new homes were 600 to 800 sq ft – so this prefab would not be ‘small’ by the standards of the day.

As for the cost. $500 USD from 1937 are ‘worth’ (and I use that term very loosely) about $7,030 (year 2006) USD.

Much of the newer small prefab offerings have the same boxy look. While I am sure the shape is driven by cost, the newer offerings material is likely greener and certainly more livable.

I just seem to lust for a few curves to add some excitement to a dwelling. Some of the more recent Solar Decathlon builds were both energy wise and very pleasing to this old eye.

jump to top Don says:

"As for the cost. $500 USD from 1937 are ‘worth’ (and I use that term very loosely) about $7,030 (year 2006) USD."

There is a difference between worth less, and worthless :)

I wonder if a similar sized house could be built for $7k today? I hate to think what the permits alone would cost, but using inexpensive plywood siding and cheap fiberglass insulation seems possible, but tight.

jump to top JC says:

that home is probably full of poisonous cancer causing chemicals that are now baned and has a major draft in the winter

jump to top jimmymak [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

This house as small as it was and at that time did not have chemcal to cause cancer. The only substance was roofing tar. go plin old wood. My grand father lived to an old age of 94, he build on and add on to one this was his idear foundation.

jump to top frankj.sokolich says:

Some Tumbleweed homes are even smaller.

jump to top mc says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads