Sexy Cycling NYC?

by Tamara Giltsoff, United Kingdom on 10. 9.07
Cars & Transportation

Bicycle_Tyre-kk-001.jpgOn Saturday night I attended The New Yorker Festival: David Byrne Presents How New Yorkers Ride Bikes courtesy of Fuseproject who had invited me along. I love cycling and bicycles: I revel in the freedom of spinning around the city on my bike and I also feel very sexy doing so.

Yes, it’s true, I think cycling is sexy because there’s nothing better looking than a beautiful bike gliding along the road with a beautiful person on it*. And it could be more so. I think a city that puts people first, pedestrians and cyclists, is a healthy, cool, sexy place to live (how many times can I put sexy next to cycling!).

The other night cycling felt very sexy. David Byrne attracted an audience of 1,500 or so – a smart, good looking, young New Yorker crowd who love cycling and can see that this city is actually a brilliant place to do it. (I was expecting a hard core of road racers and cycling geeks).

So I thought it only fair to share some of the take-out from the event. I won’t do it much justice though because it was the combination of content, music, a great audience, and wonderful auditorium that made the night and made me think that this city needs to make its people king, not cars.

Jan Gehl is an architect in Copenhagen. He presented a ‘New City Life’ – showing the audience the transformation of Copenhagen over time to a city that “makes people king”. It’s not even an inspirational story because when you look at the work done in Copenhagen it just makes so much sense. Having cars pilled up one after the other on our roads then seems like insanity.

It has taken 30 years to put Copenhagen road infrastructure in place. I think it could be done faster in any city if it was made a fundamental priority: the essence is simply to put people and not the over sized metal shells we like to sit in, at the heart of the city. There every road has two bike lanes, two pedestrian lanes, a pedestrian island in the middle of the road and two car lanes.

Everyone cycles (33% commute on bikes) or walks or takes public transport (38%). What does this mean? It means that people move quickly around a flat city; it means EVERYONE can take a bike and feel good about it – it’s ike a fashion, you’re out if you are not in; it means the city people are fit and healthy; it means the streets are nicer to be on – less noise, less pollution, many outdoors cafes; it means that the city is placed firmly on the world map for its cycling obsession; and as cycling is sexy, it means Copenhagen is sexy. Why on earth would we not want a city like this?

Josh Benson, director of New York City Dept of Transportation Bicycle Program, showed us that New York is biting on the cycling buzz. Cycling has increased a third since 2000. Numbers are at an all time high and continuing to rise. 70 out of 200 miles of cycle network planned has already been implemented and people are using it.

Cycle parks are being built at strategic points in the city, like at the Bedford L train stop in Williamsburg where riders can now tie up their bikes to 30 or so bike racks. The minute these go up they are full of bikes. Josh gave the impression that cracks were opening and every time a new one opens more and more cyclists appear… Does this mean we are on the edge or heading toward a tipping point in the city? I have watched this happen in London, my home town, where cycling has increased exponentially because more cyclists came out on the road after the July 7th bombings and for other reasons like congestion charging. It’s swell thing: the more cyclists on the road the more they come out. The more cycle racks the more bikes appear.

Next Lorna Thorpe, deputy commissioner at the New York City Department of Health, presented the facts. It’s official, New York is statistically no more dangerous to cycle than any other city in the U.S., which means there’s a perception issue to deal with here. Lorna presented the summary findings of a study done on cycling deaths in the city from 1996-2006.

Even amongst the swelling numbers of cyclists on the road the favorite chime of those who don’t cycle is that New York is the most dangerous place in the world to cycle ever, amen. Apparently an urban myth.

The good news is that New Yorkers walk and cycle four times more than any other city in the U.S., which is sort of an achievement but sort of not when you think that most people are in cars most of the time in the U.S. There are three deaths per million people p/a in NYC, the same as the country’s average.

All these deaths could be prevented. (FYI, smoking takes the lives of 10,000 people per year in the city). Men are disproportionately more likely to die on the road – Lorna reckons because they go faster and take more risks. Nearly all those who died weren’t wearing cycle helmets. Head injuries are the killer it seems, which leads nicely on to Yves Behar and Josh Morenstein from Fuseproject who presented a killer, sexy piece of design to counter a reality about cycle helmets that they are ugly and not sexy.

Fuseproject has come up with a cycle helmet shell that can be placed inside a hat fixture and customized according to what you fancy wearing that day or what the weather is doing. Yves and Josh took to the stage to present their design process and the working prototype.

The shell can be taken out of its hat (a sun cap for summer, a snow hat for winter etc.) and locked to the bike while it’s parked, which means you don’t have to hang out with a hard hat in your hand all evening. I like that and I like the idea that these hats could become a trend. You can envisage all sorts of customization and designer versions.

Paul Steely white, the alchemist of transportation in New York City, presented some great campaign work he's been doing in the city. His work showed the visual/spatial difference between 50 people sitting in cars on one cross street in Manhattan, versus 50 people riding on two buses, versus 50 people riding on bicycles. Pictures tell a thousand words: so much of our streets could be reclaimed by people (making 'people the king of the city') if we took out the many cars that clog up the road.

And that space then becomes ripe for street cafes, strolling, talking, walking, riding and kissing, without cars. An obvious thought, but beautifully explained in pictures in the campaign work.

Well, that’s it, other than to say there was lots of whispering pre, post and during the event that NYC is ‘thinking’ about a bike share scheme – the clever service system that Paris has recently implemented and that is getting people back on bicycles there, and that Oslo and Barcelona have had up and running for a while. Can you imagine how fantastic if this were to become the first U.S. city to really make cycling sexy; to own cycling as part of its cultural identity – as ownable as yellow cabs, “I Love NY” and mani-bl**dy-pedicures.

Written by Tamara Giltsoff

*Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!

Comments (6)

I'm starting to see some east coast\west coast division going on with cycling. NYC as sexy cycling, while Portland has bike porn:

http://bikeportland.org/2007/09/19/local-filmmaker-takes-bike-porn-on-the-road/

jump to top me2 says:

Great Article!!!
vsk

jump to top vsk says:

Oh how exciting! Thanks for sharing! I hope that this does become the new eco trend and makes its way to Texas. (Kinda unlikely since we have the space for big cities and lots of cars, or so they feel)

Keep us updated!

jump to top Rosie says:

Your link to NYC Department of Transportation points to the wrong agency. Josh Benson works not for New York State Department of Transportation but for New York City Department of Transportation. Its page can be found at http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/bicyclists/bikemain.shtml. Cheers.

jump to top Altan says:

The first three paragraphs of this article have to be amongst the most irritating, narcissistic comments I've heard in a long time.

What happens when those who do not fit in the general consensus of the "beautiful," master race ride by? What is thought of them? Is this to say that only "beautiful people" should be riding bicycles? Course not. Your comments serve no purpose other then to shun those who do not fit the present societal idea of "beautiful."

Are you nothing other then a plastic individual that has to be surrounded with "sexy" people, "sexy" clothes and "sexy" thoughts? Life revolving around trying to be as outwardly "sexy" as one can be to others - now tell me, how utterly plastic and surface is that?

As for the "*Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" disclaimer, I question just how many aspects of "beauty" one can define from a simply watching a cyclist pass by. Quite simply, visual beauty, and nothing else.

Welcome to the land of eye candy. Great New Packaging! No Filling!

jump to top Kurt says:

THIS is sexy: http://www.core77.com/blog/object_culture/youd_look_hotter_in_a_helmet_10036.asp

jump to top yOsh says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)