Michael Long said:
"@JSDreyer: In an ideal world with fairness and justice I would agree with you. That's the way it's supposed to work.
Unfortunately, unions ..." [
read]
cyclocross said:
""Brooks Leather. It takes a bit of breaking in but after that nothing can compare. They wear out after 200k miles or so"
Sadly, no longer t..." [
read]
said:
"It depends on what the biomass they are feeding the algae is, and how much better that works than just letting them grow regularly. If they are say..." [
read]
JSDreyer said:
"It seems inefficient to grow plants which then have to be harvested and transported to the algae to feed them. Growing crops is a incredibly fuel ..." [
read]
babs_GA_USA said:
"I am not that old, ok, i am 61. and I used to hang out all my laundry in Maryland, outside in the good months and in the basement in the winter or ..." [
read]
Let's get our legislators on board and build some more nuclear plants. We now have the technology to make clean energy and also non-lethal radioactive waste (like france). Support nuclear power.
Perhaps this is a better resource:
http://www.epa.gov/cleanrgy/powerprofiler.htm
You tell it your zip code, and it tells you you where you get your power from. That is, how much of your power comes from each type of generation. It also tells you how much pollution that generates, and compares it to the national average. It's great.
If GreenPeace cannot or will not have the information. Will Treehugger please post a spot I can type in my zip code to find out how much sickening pollution I and my family is recieving now from the Ohio coal fired power plants to the West of us?
Check out the EPA site I posted in my comment, JC.
Well California seems pretty green. The East seems laced with nuclear and coal power plants. =T
what is non-lethal radioactive waste?
and not to be dogmatic or anything, but, how does that fit into "zero waste"?
ok - thank you for that easy to overview-map!
Once again Greenpeace displays their willful ignorance. In the future it might be beneficial to refrain from adding this FUD to your site, as it taints genuine discourse.
Once again Greenpeace displays their willful ignorance. In the future it might be beneficial to refrain from adding this FUD to your site, as it taints genuine discourse.
Yeah, an anti-treehugger troll named "Abe Lincoln" is here for genuine discourse. And the Pope is Hindu.
"Yeah, an anti-treehugger troll named "Abe Lincoln" is here for genuine discourse."
Name that fallacy -> Ad hominem.
Thank you for playing.
"Once again Greenpeace displays their willful ignorance. In the future it might be beneficial to refrain from adding this FUD to your site, as it taints genuine discourse."
Name that fallacy -> Ad hominem.
Thank you for playing.
Thanks Ross, great resource. I've added it to my blog.
http://envirostats.info/2007/10/25/c021/
Give me a way to link to you and I'll put it on the blog entry, if you want.