Climate Paranoia Strikes Deep
by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 10. 4.07
"Australia must populate its undeveloped tropical north or face invasion by Asian refugees driven south by climate change, an outspoken Government MP has warned."
"Northern Australia, which unlike the south of the continent enjoys an annual wet season and has plenty of water, could be coveted if temperature rises leave parts of Asia short of food and water. Rising sea levels could make millions of Asian people homeless and drive them to seek sanctuary elsewhere, Heffernan believes."
"Nearly 40 per cent of Asia's four billion population live within 70km of the sea, with low-lying cities such as Bangkok particularly vulnerable to a surge in sea levels. An Oxford University study claimed that 73 million Chinese could lose their homes as a result of rising sea levels."
This thinking is from a government that has, for years, busied itself with climate denial, backing US-grown obfuscations. When denial collapses, paranoia fills the gap. A perfect distraction from the work of mitigating against climate disaster.
What lyrics harken from the 1960's?
Via::New Zealand Herald Image credit::Remote Sensing Tutorial, North Coast of Australia
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- On Climate Change, Africa Votes As One Country And One Continent
- Tropical Forests Better Left Intact As Carbon Sinks Than Converted to Biofuel Plantations
- Emissions from Soil Organic Carbon Not as Bad as Previously Thought
- GHG Photos: Climate Change Photography Shapes Debate





















This doesn't strike me as paranoid at all. It seems very rational to discuss what will happen with tens of millions of climate refugees.
No, this sounds like plain old racism. After all, Florida will be gone, too. He doesn't seem to be concerned about being overwhelmed by Floridians. I guess he would just like the Asian folk to drown or starve.
I live in Vancouver, BC. Just downhill is Richmond, where nearly a million people, a high percentage of which are Asian, live. Richmond will be entirely inundated by six feet of water. So far, no one is talking about what Vancouver will do with a million climate refugees. Sadly, I bet we will hear some thinly veiled racism coming out as the water rises.
funny...I didn't catch the racism slant on this at all.
But the fact remains that many countries will be faced with expanding populations -- both to house and to feed as the water rises. It is a dilemma. I read that New Zealand plans to welcome a number of people from surrounding islands as the water takes over their land.
I didn't hear any racism. But such a comment is definitely paranoia.
I saw the TV show in question.
It was about the affect of global warning of Australian food production. The latest reports, released here this week, talked about drying in the continent's food bowl (The Marray Basin).
Sen. Heffernan's comments where in the context the need to at least continue current food production levels to:
1 - feed the Australian population and
2 - continue to export food.
The senator was warning that rising sea levels could make millions of Asian people homeless & short of food. That Australia should endeavour to continue to feed far above its domestic population by developing the North without the mistakes made in the South.
The second half of the program was devoted to the best ecologically sound methods that could be used in the North.
Sen Heffernan is a Liberal (centre-right) and a farmer from south eastern Australia (The Murray Basin).
Apart from the fact that a lot of the north of Australia will also be inundated by rising sea levels there is one other small problem with Heffernans ideas.
The soils are generally poor in Australia, and more so in highly leaching environments like the tropical north in areas substantially devoid of mountain building processes and volcanism. And because of the generally low relief, when it does rain, it floods.
Heffernan has and will use any divisive tactic http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2002/s503843.htm
Ah, good old Heffernan - you can always rely on him for some offensive statements as soon as he gets near the media.
I agree with Ruben, this is racism - Heffernan is anti-immigration, so it figures that the first thing to get him worried about CC is the thought of brown people coming here.
We do need to think about the consequences of climate change on populations - but New Zealand is leading the way in this region, while Australia continues to stick it's head in the sand. Panic won't help, but cutting pollution might.
The above quotes are quotes from the NZ newspaper article, not quotes of Heffernan from last night show. How much is written and spin to sell newspapers, after all, that one of the reason to come here to read stuff.
The transcript are up on the web now. This is not a full transcript. I'm sure mosaic farming got mention near the end of the show, but I can't find it in the text.
Heffernan made two comment that specifically referenced China. Remember this is in the Australian context. China & India are both close & major immigration sources. Florida, London & Paris are half a world away. When ever I hear about Global Warming stuff, I ask, what that mean to China & India. It will be China & India that decide how far over 450 ppm CO2 we will end up going!
The first is the one I referred to above.
The second, for me, was about human nature and why we will pay money for luxuraies and complain about the cost of basics.
I suppose it all comes down to weather you believe the senator is a reformed global warming sceptic or not.
I don't like him reliance on GMOs.
The guys a real farmer, and as a real polly, gets to see lots of things. I wouldn't accept or reject his views any more than any other federal senator.
Lots of generalisation flying around. I don't think I'ld say being anti-immigration make you racist. Or the one characteristic of land automatically makes it useless to all forms of farming. One man's desert is another man's Olive grove.
There is not such thing as marginal land, only marginal land uses.
My mistake, the NZ Herald story is based on a Bulletin story, not the ABC TV program.
Pity the Bulletin story isn't online, guess they got hard copy to sell
Teaser here.
Heffernan denies the Bulletin quotes, and the Bulletin stands by them. See here and here.
The senator does talk about bio security issues on Difference of Option.
Speaking as someone raised in a summer rainfall farming district in Australia. I find it depressing that southerners and city people are quite willing to enforce draconian environmental laws that stifle planning and the introduction of new practices and innovation. There has got to be a better balance than this.
How do you stop another Cubbie Station without killing innovation on the small.
I spent part of the late Christmas holidays reading the 'Code for self-assessable development for taking overland flow water for stock and domestic purposes' and the 'Code for self-assessable development for taking overland flow water using small scale storages'. Personally, I find the use of 'taking' in the title to be rude. Sounds like you're taking government water, not catching your own rainfall. The codes still don't work. I understand the version 3 is currently on the legal drawing board at the moment.
Why develop an ultra long fellow system (like is used in tropical PNG), when you risk the whole thing being classes at remnant vegetation and 'protected'.
Look at all the problems that Peter Andrews had trialing Natural Sequence Farming.
The laws that Peter fought and cost him so much (financial ruin, marriage breakdown and child suicide) still exist and are enforced. Peter only got special dispensation due to his public profile (from the Australian Story coverage). If you're not Peter, there is still all the old bureaucracies to fight.
Its hard watch farming districts die. Any polly who fights for these reforms has my support, not matter how conservative or radical his social views are.
Rant ends ;)