most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Kevin G. Crump said: "It would be fascinating to see Chicago gain considerable ground in its mission to become equivalents to New York City, Milan, and Paris when it com..." [read]

Tricina said: "Consumers feel duped with all the greenwashing that companies have thrown at them. Fuji Water says they are "green to the last drop", Clorox has "G..." [read]

العاب said: "It seems we will never bring these anti nature pesticides to an end as long as these companies are eager to make material gains at the extent of en..." [read]

bryan said: "I pick up a piece of litter then drop it on the ground again. Is this littering? Releasing CO2 that would be released anyway is even l..." [read]

James said: "2 things not addressed: 1. If we are more mobile, then when a city makes a bad decision, businesses will migrate out faster. Okay, competit..." [read]

Climate Carrots

by April Streeter, Gothenburg, Sweden on 10.22.07
Food & Health

climate_carrots.jpg

Carrots, tomatoes, cucumbers and potatoes are likely to be the first foods to get a special climate-friendly label in Sweden, according to Swedish organic certifier KRAV and the quality control organization Svenskt Sigill.

Earlier this year, huge UK food retailer Tesco announced that it would introduce a climate labeling system. Tesco's plan is to climate rate on a sliding scale all of the more than 70,000 products founds on its shelves.

KRAV and Svenskt Sigill instead want climate-labeling to be a value-added certification for organic or sustainably produced food. The two organizations just got the blessings of Sweden's environment, agriculture and consumer affairs' ministers. And it seems of the Swedish public, too - a survey this summer showed 73 percent of consumers said they would always or often buy climate-labeled foods. Around 40 percent said they would be willing to pay 10 percent more for the label.

Climate label project manager Johan Cejie has said that those numbers are probably too good to be true.

Instead Cejie estimated that probably a quarter of Swedes would actually pony up to buy the newly-labeled climate-friendly goods when they actually hit the shelves. Likely it is the consumers who already buy organic or biodynamic food, he added.

This fall KRAV and Svenskt Sigill will try to figure out how to set up the certification for a roll-out in 2008. Spokesperson Helena Enquist said that it hasn't been decided whether to launch a totally new graphic identity for the climate label or to enhance the two organizations' existing labels.

Consumers responding to the summer survey said that the distance foods travel and how they travel were the most important criteria, and they seemed less concerned with possibly unmeasured methane emissions at Swedish farms.

Sweden's largest food retailers haven't been too enthusiastic about climate labeling, saying it is 'too complicated' - but other indicators show shoppers seeking out more organically-labeled food. One of the most mainstream retailers, ICA, registered a 30 percent increase in organic sales in the first half of 2007. ::KRAV (Swedish/English site)

Comments (3)

What I want to know now is what's so good about carrots, cucumbers, and potatoes? Should I be taking some more exotic foods out of my diet and replacing it with these?

jump to top Ross says:

KRAV is a good thing for the swedish consumer!

jump to top mopeddelar says:

i have just moved to sweden and paid my 1st trip to the supermarket this very afternoon. how atrocious!! very little choice of vegetables, individually wrapped organic produce, they had no organic eggs in stock, special offer amazon beef and probably a quarter the amount of organic food as most food shops i know in london. a very disappointing experience.

sweden does so well on so many fronts but it would take alot for me to congratulate their supermarkets. Krav need to carefully consider whether to call the new labelling climate friendly for 'friendly' wouldn't be about having less impact than other produce but should actually designate a product that is positive for the environment. if the standards are that high i will rejoice but if it does have negative impact (albeit less) it would fall into the same marketing claptrap category as the deceitful prius, calling that car eco-friendly- blah!

i really hope something is done so one can rely on these labels being be truthful, even if it means less ambition. i hope climate friendly will mean just that.

jump to top Dave says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads