most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
said: "Meat is still a necessary part of the human diet, so we can't get rid of it completely. But we definitely need to consume less of it than we curre..." [read]

Carina said: "Thank you for this mail. I'm seventeen, and became a vegetarian when I was 13 for ethical reasons, and in the beginning I had trouble realizing tha..." [read]

Don said: "I have to smile at this posting. I get an energy audit - every month. When the bills come due. We have been able to cut bot..." [read]

Deborah said: "Agreed! Even though the Ecologic Products are made of environmentally approved materials, they still endorse a disposable society. Disposa..." [read]

lyn said: "I have been using Shaklee Get Clean supplies to clean my house. I was not using them for the tile floors and would like to know the mix to use. I ..." [read]

Carbon Dioxide Production Much Faster than Originally Anticipated

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 10.23.07
Science & Technology

coal plant

About all that carbon dioxide we've been spewing into the atmosphere - yeah, it's worse than we thought. That seems to be the main take-away message of a new study by an international team of researchers that found that current carbon dioxide production levels have been far exceeding the already pessimistic estimates being used by models to predict future climate trends.

A booming world economy has caused atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations to rise by a whopping 1.93 ppm a year - the fastest rate of increase since monitoring began in 1959. Just to give some context, carbon dioxide concentrations rose by an average of 1.58 ppm during the 1980s and an average of 1.49 ppm during the 1990s (hardly quiescent decades, economically-speaking).

"[The paper presents] a consistent picture of the increasing accumulation of atmospheric CO2 and, hence, the increasing urgency to do something about it. Just because the last 7 years have shown accelerating trends does not mean that the next 7 or 50 or 100 will be the same. But they are what they are, and we need to pay attention," said S. Randy Kawa, a physical scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.

As Gregg Marland, the study's co-author, noted during a recent interview, it "will be important to keep watch over the next few years to see if the changing trend is a continuing one." Given our past track record, there is unfortunately little reason to expect that trend to stop any time soon.

Via ::ScienceNOW: Planet's CO2 Production Surges (news website)

See also: ::Oceans No Longer as Effective at Storing Carbon Dioxide, ::Never Mind Future Temperature Increases: CO2 Emissions Deserve EPA's Attention NOW

Image courtesy of cjohnson7 via flickr

Comments (8)

noo, that is not good news :( ..scary picture too!

jump to top supra says:

Damn right, scary. Just when we need to be reducing....we're not even staying still....we're increasing the rate of increase :(

jump to top MY says:

it is important to "watch these changes" to see if our emissions, as a human collective continue to 'increase the rate of increase'.

watching, understanding and analysing is critical but the whole point of doing that is so that we know what change to enact and how. i vote for strong political pressure, urgency and intellectual rigour over ethical consumption and consumerism. demand strong restrictions on polluting activities and industry, don't ask or offer carrot. let's stop wasting space asking people to change their lightbulbs lets just legislate for inefficient bulbs to not be produced and sold.

jump to top Karma means action - what goes around... says:

Even if our personal efforts to live sustainably are offset by industrial giants and less-concerned individuals, it's good practice for a future that may not offer another choice of lifestyle. Seriously. Whether our personal efforts amass to climate stability or not, the days of using as much of whatever we want as often as we please are over.

jump to top Tim says:

why did I just hear about CO2 emmisions rising slower for the year 2006? Can someone back me up on this?

jump to top Tim says:

why did I just hear about CO2 emmisions rising slower for the year 2006? Can someone back me up on this?

jump to top Tim says:

Tim, CO2 emissions in the US actually decreased in 2006, but China surpassed us in 2006, easily mitigating any slight improvement the US made.

jump to top Ian Swett says:

Let's see what a co2 level chart looks like for a period of time that is meaningful, so people see the truth about where the earth has been and where it is going. Lets try something like a one million year chart that shows co2 levels. We have that capability, now lets see the real truth and put the alarmists to bed. All of this oil we are consumming came from a period when co2 levels were in the multi-thousands, and plants grew in huge sizes. The earth survived then as it will now.

jump to top Dick Wilson says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads