th comments
John Taylor said: "I think the photo tells a big story to Treehuggers. Sarah Palin wanted to remove Polar bears from endangered species protection and open A..." [read]

Dan said: "Agreed, great idea. They do attract mice however. Any ideas on how to control mice populations around chickens?..." [read]

said: ""Can you please provide a link that substantiates your claim? JL" -Its well known in the auto industry that the makers of diesel motors did..." [read]

Jim said: "Just wanted to try to clarify a few things from the article and some comments. There is a tremendous political risk to raising the price of ..." [read]

Michael Long said: "There's also the possibility that the Fiesta could, in effect, make all of their other cars look bad in comparison. "But, why does THIS ca..." [read]

Chicago Company Offers Hybrid Conversions

by Matthew Sparkes, London, UK on 09.14.07
Cars & Transportation

Chicago based company, NetGain, create and fit plug-in hybrid conversion kits for trucks. They are also working on kits for smaller cars, which will be available in 2-3 years. NetGain employee, David Cloud, shows us how it all works in this not so in-depth piece from Fox News. Apparently the kit can improve the efficiency of a standard panel truck by 20-30%. This is a large percentage rise, but when you consider that these things only tend to get 6-7mpg in the first place, then it doesn't seem like such a large improvement.

Under normal cuircumstances, the gas engine provides all the power - the electric motor only kicks in when the truck is accelerating, which is the moment when the engine is at its least economical. The savings in fuel costs should pay for the initial cost of the unit, as well as fitting costs, in 2-3 years according to Cloud. Several companies, such as Safeway are funning truck fleets on bio-diesel. The initial cost is far lower for this technology, but there is obviously still some controversy surrounding the use of bio-diesel. One of the companies previous projects, the eBug, is shown below. ::NetGain

ebug01.jpg

Comments (2)

"Apparently the kit can improve the efficiency of a standard panel truck by 20-30%. This is a large percentage rise, but when you consider that these things only tend to get 6-7mpg in the first place, then it doesn't seem like such a large improvement."

saving 20-30% of the fuel used by a vehicle getting 6-7mpg is saving 5 times more fuel than getting 20-30% fuel savings on cars getting 30-35mpg.

Please do be a bit more rigorous. =/

jump to top Daniel Szakaly says:

20-30% is an enormous jump considering we're talking about vehicles that often do more than 35,000m per year.

It saves about 1400 gallons per year.

Typical family car = 20000m per year (most are actually less) at 30mpg = 667 gallons, with the 30% improvement = 512 gal, for a savings of 155 gallons.

The biggest savings come by improving the biggest users. Sure, there are more cars than trucks, but no one answer is going to be the magic bullet.

jump to top Leif says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads