th comments
Space said: "Some of the crops in the table have a negative gas emission? Since that figure is supposed to include burning of the fuel, I don't see how ..." [read]

Nick said: "80Mph ? Speed limit is 65mph. How fast are you really going on LA freeways...50% of the time you are going If you want ACCELERATION, fast CORN..." [read]

brennan said: "FYI, the Joy of Cooking claims that only black and grey squirrels can be eaten; red squirrels are claimed to have an unpleasant taste. In V..." [read]

brennan said: "I sold smarts for a living for a year up here in Canada. I can tell you that they were damned fun to drive, and we always chose to drive them whene..." [read]

Richard Campbell said: "A dumb bike is better than a Smart Car...." [read]

Orbiting Space Power Systems Would Convert Sunlight into Laser Beams

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 09. 7.07
Science & Technology

japanese solar satelliteWhile the rest of the world (save for the Indians) has been busy focusing on mainly terrestrial-based solar energy alternatives, the Japanese have been looking to the heavens to find a potential solution. Scientists from the Institute of Laser Engineering at Osaka University and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) have just developed a new technology for converting sunlight into laser beams — a technology that could form the basis for JAXA's Space Solar Power Systems (SSPS) project.

The SSPS project seeks to put a prototype space-based power system in orbit — 22,400 mi (36,000 km) above the equator — with the goal of harnessing the sun's energy to produce laser beams that would generate electricity or hydrogen on Earth through the intermediary of a terrestrial power station. The lasers — using plates built from a ceramic material containing chromium, which can absorb sunlight, and neodymium, which converts it into laser beams — outperformed earlier technologies four times over, demonstrating a solar-to-laser energy conversion efficiency of 42%.

SOL

The main advantage of using space-based power systems over terrestrial ones is that the former will not be subject to cloudy conditions or nighttime darkness, allowing them to collect solar energy 24 hours a day. The researchers estimate that a single satellite-mounted power system could generate as much energy as a 1-GW nuclear power plant by the time they send the first one into orbit in the next few decades.

Via ::Pink Tentacle: Electricity from orbiting solar-powered lasers (blog)

See also: ::40% Efficient Solar Cells: They Are Being Used Back On Earth

Comments (14)

Would this cook a plane or bird that came between the satellite and the station on earth?

jump to top Tex says:

My dad would go nuts. He's been saying for years that we need to generate solar power in space rather than just on Earth.

jump to top Green SAHM says:

Cook a plane? Possibly.

Would need a no-fly zone around the download area. We've got that in places around the world now.

Cook a bird? Possibly.

Would need to position the receivers out of migratory paths and feeding/nesting areas. Off-shore might work.

jump to top Bob Wallace says:

While cool wouldn't this break international treaties about weapons in space?

Wasn't this the basis for a James Bond movie?

jump to top Anonymous says:

I think that sensors and some programing could be used to turn the beam off when planes got near. The way technologies are improving I would not even be certain that they could not turn it off and on so fast that they could avoid birds though house flies might get burned. I have also heard of the idea of using large receivers combined with wavelengths that don't heat matter well so that they can more easily get around some of these issues.

While it is good that people are looking at this it sounds like there are a lot of technologies to be developed and that it is a very long term goal.

jump to top Saul Wall says:

The catroonish SOL weapon-satelite pictured is from the violent yet cool anime movie AKIRA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akira_(film)

jump to top Sam-Hec says:

Mmm .. what a fantastic way to heat the atmosphere ;)

jump to top erbal says:

I proposed a similar system using cheap mylar concentrating reflectors in space (convex shape is maintained by solar wind). It seems like it would be ridiculously cheap per watt doing it as I proposed, and relatively easily (just tons of reflective fabric, and a collimating lens at the apex).

see http://whorledview.com/2007/06/24/

I didn't think of converting it to laser though for better and more focused transmission. Undoubtedly that's the way to do it. That or microwaves, but laser makes more sense to me.

Yes, this would be the ultimate weapon too. Now that I think about it, it's unbelievable it isn't already done.

jump to top davea0511 says:

I proposed a similar system using cheap mylar concentrating reflectors in space (convex shape is maintained by solar wind). It seems like it would be ridiculously cheap per watt doing it as I proposed, and relatively easily (just tons of reflective fabric, and a collimating lens at the apex).

see http://whorledview.com/2007/06/24/

I didn't think of converting it to laser though for better and more focused transmission. Undoubtedly that's the way to do it. That or microwaves, but laser makes more sense to me.

Yes, this would be the ultimate weapon too. Now that I think about it, it's unbelievable it isn't already done.

jump to top davea0511 says:

I proposed a similar system using cheap mylar concentrating reflectors in space (convex shape is maintained by solar wind). It seems like it would be ridiculously cheap per watt doing it as I proposed, and relatively easily (just tons of reflective fabric, and a collimating lens at the apex).

see http://whorledview.com/2007/06/24/

I didn't think of converting it to laser though for better and more focused transmission. Undoubtedly that's the way to do it. That or microwaves, but laser makes more sense to me.

Yes, this would be the ultimate weapon too. Now that I think about it, it's unbelievable it isn't already done.

jump to top davea0511 [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

You know, one potential 24/7 solution is to put the receiving station at the north (or south) pole, and then you don't have to worry about geosynchronicity - you can even put the array at one of the moon's poles.

jump to top davea0511 [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

People-solar is here right now and it will not need to cost you any upfront investment-click below!

Perhaps it could send out the beam in 5 second pulses, stopping for 10 seconds and sending out a weak charge to verify if the line of sight is interrupted (The ground station would reply with a laser signal back). That way, should a bird or plane get in the way, the system will stop for them.

jump to top Tim says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads