most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
megan said: "Why not buy a used lunch box? I see them constantly at garage sales and thrift stores for under $5. You can save small jars left over from things l..." [read]

said: "Why the sticker shock? Look at regular- plastic lunchboxes, the kind kids take to school, and you'll see that cost $5-10, just for the box...." [read]

BirdTrouble said: "how does that effect those of us who only eat organic meats???..." [read]

James J. said: "Eric is correct. There are some things that I don't like about Walmart, but they are leading in innovation, and the fact is that you can buy almos..." [read]

RemyC said: "Check out the L5 Society... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L5_Society..." [read]

Learning the Language: Eco-lingo Goes Mainstream

by Sami Grover, Carrboro, NC, USA on 09.22.07
Culture & Celebrity (books)

Language.jpgEnvironmental buzz words are everywhere – from ‘carbon neutral’, to ‘gas guzzler’, to ‘peak oil’, a number of terms that were the preserve of us tofu eating classes for many years are now heading firmly into the mainstream. We’ve written about biodiesel’s entry into the dictionary here, and we’ve celebrated carbon neutral’s status as word of the year here. Now Alison Benjamin, over at the Guardian, has an interesting blog entry on how the rise in environmental concern is changing our language, and our dictionaries:

With the plethora of newsprint and commentary about climate change in the last couple of years, reflecting its meteoric rise up the political and media agenda, it is perhaps little surprise that these green buzzwords have entered the lexicon. So next time someone looks at me blankly when I tell them their Chelsea tractor is increasing their carbon footprint, I can add "A large, four-wheel-drive vehicle used in urban areas" is causing a rise in "the amount of carbon dioxide emitted due to the activities, especially the consumption of fossil fuels, of a particular person"(i.e.you).

We just hope that this change goes beyond mere semantics and lexicography. It’s not enough to know what a carbon footprint is – we need to know how big it is, and more importantly, we need to know how we can make it smaller. ::The Guardian::via site visit::

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads