Global Warming Could Cause World Crop Collapse
by Kimberley D. Mok, Montreal, Canada 
on 09.16.07
With the U.N.-affililated Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) already warning of declining grain harvests due to extreme weather, a U.S. study released last week suggests that global warming could cause world agricultural systems to face possible collapse by 2080, with countries in the south being the hardest hit.
India, Pakistan, most of Africa and most of Latin America would be the areas most affected, according to the Washington-based Center for Global Development and the Peterson Institute for International Economics. India, which is fast becoming the world’s most populous nation, could stand to see its agricultural yield to fall 29 to 38 percent.
William Cline, the study’s author and a well-known economist, notes that global yields for major crops have actually slowed down. "There's already a sign that there is fatigue in the Green Revolution," he said, noting that the average annual growth in yields during the 1960s and 1970s was 2.6 percent per year – yet by the 1980s and 1990s it had slowed to 1.8 percent.
"The problem is that you need the technical change to keep up with demand for food," emphasizes Cline. "I estimate that the global demand for food after you take into account higher population, as well as higher incomes, would about triple from now to late in the century."
While some analysts believe that excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in fact will benefit crops, citing laboratory studies that show a yield increase of 30 percent, Cline counters that farm field studies have demonstrated that benefits from so-called “carbon fertilization” is closer to 15 percent and eventually leveling out.
Conversely, food production in northern countries, especially in industrialized nations, could increase due to the effects of global warming increasing the length of the growing season. Cline cautions however that it will not meet world demand for food.
Already, there is an increasing competition between human and wild/domesticated animals for food supplies – worldwide meat production is increasing and most of it depends on grain – ultimately bringing into question the future sustainability of such a trend.
Using modelled projections on temperature and rainfall, the study’s results could also be further aggravated by unpredictable factors such as crop pests, severe droughts and water shortages.
"Governments and millions of poor people in developing countries have limited ability to cope with such changes," said Nancy Birdsall, president of the Centre for Global Development. "At least a billion people live in the poorest countries that are likely to be worst hit by this slow-moving crisis. This will be a serious problem for us all."
::Planet Ark & ::InterPress Service
See also ::Shhhh, We've Got a Secret: Soil Solves Global Warming, Part 1, ::GM Food Debates Heats Up with Global Warming, ::The Argument against GMO
Image: Yale Daily News
Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- Green Glossary: Meltwater
- Is Your Kitchen Garden Toxic? 5 Ways To Fix Polluted Soil For Safe Homegrown Food
- Eat a Vegetarian Diet, Reduce Your Carbon Footprint by a Ton
- Is School Food Harming Kids? Enlist a Labor Day Eat-In To Promote Fresh, Healthy Food
- Avoid Evaporating Gas: Park in the Shade and Buy Gas When it's Cool
- Support Obama's Ocean Policy with a Friendly Letter
Oh, well. Let's keep this in perspective. It is still more important to deal with malaria first, right Bjorn? This is not a 'catastrophe' like malaria is a catastrophe. (This is an inside sarcastic joke for those that don't understand it.)
Global Warming means that greater amounts of water are being evaporated into the atmosphere and that resultant higher rainfall may be concentrated in certain areas while leaving other places desertified as in the case of large areas of central and north China. Extra heavy rains in some areas or high heat zones and desertification in others do not afford good agricultural opportunities; attempts to increase the tonnage of crops in some provinces have recently proven futile. Perhaps the answer is to adapt the raising of crops specifcally to meet requirments for climate change.
Technical changes in China needed to increase food production have included the diversion of southern rivers to the north, the planting of shrubs on the borders of deserts to hold back desert expansion and the consideration to replace the traditional water intensive rice crop in dryer areas with potatoes.
Root crops of all types which generally use less water may have to supplement or gradually replace above ground crops. Techniques such as underground drip irrigation which can bring water directly to roots could be used instead of the less efficient above ground irrigation method where rapid evaporation takes place. Plastic covers or mulching to hold in moisture may also prove effective.
Other techniques to develop may require methods to store vast quantities of water underground during times of floods as evidenced recently in Anhui and other central provinces where villages had to be evacuated for the specific purposes of controlled flooding. This was to prevent greater damage in other areas. Yet, most of the water was lost to agriculture due to lack of storage facilities.
adrianakau@aol.com
I wonder if it's more likely that global warming would allow booming crops in current and new areas?
Imagine the main part of Canada able to grow grains in massive quantities?
I'm seeing a lot of "coulds" and "some believes". What I'm not seeing is common sense: plants grow better when its warmer. And how many people have accepted the foregone conclusion that we're actually seeing "extreme weather"?