most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
megan said: "Why not buy a used lunch box? I see them constantly at garage sales and thrift stores for under $5. You can save small jars left over from things l..." [read]

said: "Why the sticker shock? Look at regular- plastic lunchboxes, the kind kids take to school, and you'll see that cost $5-10, just for the box...." [read]

BirdTrouble said: "how does that effect those of us who only eat organic meats???..." [read]

James J. said: "Eric is correct. There are some things that I don't like about Walmart, but they are leading in innovation, and the fact is that you can buy almos..." [read]

RemyC said: "Check out the L5 Society... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L5_Society..." [read]

EPA Bans Most Toxic Chemical Ever Released into World's Oceans - Forty Years Later

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 09. 1.07
Business & Politics

boat hull

You'd think that a substance the EPA itself deems one of the most toxic ever released into the world's waters would've been outlawed a long time ago, right? Well, you'd be wrong: only now, several decades after its harmful effects had already been well established, is tributyltin (TBT) expected to be banned. Once the White House Office of Budget and Management clears it, the treaty will go to the United Nations, where it will be ratified by the full U.N. International Maritime Organization.

Tributyltin, a type of biocide, is a cheap and powerful barnacle and algae killer that was once commonly used on most of the world's commercial ships. It is typically mixed into the bottom coating for hulls, where it helps keep the ship clear of barnacles and other similar species. TBT is highly prized by sailboat racers and yachtsmen who use it to make their hulls move more easily through the water and by certain environmentalists, who argue it can help prevent the spread of invasive species from one port to another.

Yet it wasn't long until scientists and policymakers found some serious downsides to its use: by the mid-1990s, over 500 research papers had linked the chemical to adverse health and environmental effects — including "profound reproductive effects" and diminished marine-species populations. Lindy Johnson, a lawyer who works for NOAA, called it "very, very bad stuff."

Though many major European and U.S. chemical and paint companies, which have endorsed the treaty, had already stopped using it by 2001, it became widely prevalent in much of Asia, particularly in China, which just recently pledged to not add DDT to its hull coatings anymore. The Bush administration has yet to approve the treaty, though it is expected to do so within the coming months. Robert Martin, the global marine-business director for Arch Chemicals Inc. and one of the treaty negotiators, expressed a view that is no doubt on the minds of many when he said: "It'd be good for the U.S. to be involved with an environmental treaty, especially in this administration."

A long overdue piece of legislation, yes, but one that can still do much good.

Via ::McClatchy Newspapers: Toxic ship-paint additive banned — after 40 years (news website)

See also: ::Gender Bender Chemicals Also Make You Fat, ::Shiver Me Timbers: Papaya Enzyme Repels Barnacles

Comments (3)

At least they finally did it, it is about time.

I remember seeing a recent (in the last 6 months) episode of 60 Minutes where they showed a coast of India where it's an unofficial ships graveyard. The health conditions are questionable at the least, then they showed the water and the sand condition.

My jaw was on the floor that this could have still been happening.

Putting all the environmental impacts aside... look at the impact on health of the people surrounding the area.

There layed sheets of asbestos cement, containers of oil seeping around the people. The toxicity and the smell would have been high.

I wonder what will be done about that.

jump to top Stefano says:

On September 17th Panama ratified the Antifouling Treaty and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) terms for entry into force were met. This means effective September 17, 2008 no ships can be painted or enter into any port of countries that have signed the treaty. Let's hope the US ratifies the treaty soon so we will no longer allow ships with TBT to enter the ports of the United states

jump to top Robert Martin says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads