most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
Rich said: "Kashrut is dietary law. Please don't eat the fabric softener...." [read]

megan said: "Why not buy a used lunch box? I see them constantly at garage sales and thrift stores for under $5. You can save small jars left over from things l..." [read]

said: "Why the sticker shock? Look at regular- plastic lunchboxes, the kind kids take to school, and you'll see that cost $5-10, just for the box...." [read]

BirdTrouble said: "how does that effect those of us who only eat organic meats???..." [read]

James J. said: "Eric is correct. There are some things that I don't like about Walmart, but they are leading in innovation, and the fact is that you can buy almos..." [read]

Quote of the Day: Emily Enderle on Diversity in the Environmental Movement

by Jasmin Malik Chua, Jersey City, USA on 09.14.07
Culture & Celebrity

chickies.jpg
Photo credit: chrisjfry

It is an exciting time to be a member of the environmental movement in the United States. Large events and organizations, including the Super Bowl, the Oscars and Yahoo, are becoming carbon neutral. The largest global retailer, Wal-Mart, is currently going green. Mainstream magazines, including Sports Illustrated and Vanity Fair, are featuring environmentally-focused cover stories and editions. Beyond the financial incentives and the celebrity glamour associated with being green, many previously unengaged segments of the population, including religious communities, people of color and people from different socio-economic classes, are becoming increasingly interested in participating in the movement's efforts.

Currently, however, there is a lack of diversity and inclusivity in environmental institutions and our movement. This is a systemic problem. Diversity is about strengthening the movement we are dedicated to by making it resilient and capable of adapting, regardless of what we face in the future. Widespread understanding of the values that diversity can provide is essential to enhancing our collective effort and the world, yet such understanding is still absent in far too many places."

—Emily Enderle, Framing the Discussion (2007, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies)

[Via ::SES: Science, Education & Society]

Comments (1)

Excellent stuff, Amy! I remember the environmental movement from the early 70s onward, and a lot of it was merely NIMBY - trying to force development or industrialization elsewhere so as to preserve pristine vistas near to home. I grew up in the Jersey suburbs, which can be pretty idyllic, but if you drive through East Orange, where my parents first settled, you see a gigantic superhighway built for suburban commuters which cuts the town in half, destroying most of its appeal. \

And of course, this less "valuable" East Orange is now populated by minorities.

Americans have to realize that an injury to the environment anywhere is an injury everywhere, and we have to improve our way of life in the aggregate, not just move it around. That's why I'm so excited about clean production. If you have a factory that emits no pollutants, you don't get polluted cities that eventually become aparteid-style ghettos. Attack the root of the problem!

jump to top rob says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads