most popular: Sex in Small Cars?


most popular:
Killer Smog Clouds


th comments
BirdTrouble said: "how does that effect those of us who only eat organic meats???..." [read]

James J. said: "Eric is correct. There are some things that I don't like about Walmart, but they are leading in innovation, and the fact is that you can buy almos..." [read]

RemyC said: "Check out the L5 Society... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L5_Society..." [read]

RemyC said: "Fifty or so people? What is this? A secret cabal of the green media elite meeting in the dead of night to decide the fate of the manipulated masses..." [read]

weee recycling said: "6) Assault with weapon. Given that there have been many cyclists killed by cars it's tough to see why this isn't 6) Assault with a dea..." [read]

Vespa Go Green Video Challenge

by Sean Fisher, Cincinnati, Ohio on 08.21.07
Cars & Transportation

vespa_gts.jpg


Who wouldn't want to win a new Vespa? At 65+mpg, not only would you feel like you were traversing the roads of Rome, you could feel good about sipping, not guzzling gas. In fact, according to the Vespa USA website, if Americans switched only 10% of their total driving to scooters, ever day we could cut consumption of gas by 14 million gallons and cut carbon emissions by 324 pounds. Well, Vespa is giving a chance to win one of 3 scooters to help you reduce your commuting carbon footprint. All you have to do is head on over to Vespa's Go Green Challenge and create a video about the economic and environmental benefits of scootering. Head on over, create a video, and make your fellow TreeHuggers proud.

See also ::Vespa Unveils Hybrid Scooters

::Go Green Vespa Video Challenge


Comments (22)

Just one little thing--The rules say Vespa will own your video submissions and you will retain no rights. Is a chance to win a scooter a good trade-off?

jump to top Mike O'Brien says:

Wait, a scooter without a catalytic converter is somehow good for the environment? Look at all the things other than CO2 this machine spews.

I agree with Ben. What people don't understand is that these small, high MPG engines are usually totally unenforced when it comes to their emissions. With no catalytic converter these small engines are producing a large amount of pollutants. So yes, they use very little gas to propel it around the streets...they also do so very inefficiently.

Things like the average gas mower or roto-tiller will produce more CO2 emissions and other horrible pollutants per litre used then per litre used in most vehicles.

Get, informed first!

Cheers,

-------------------------------------

author's note:

Many modern scooters, including the Vespa GTS shown, do have catalytic converters. It also has EPA and CARB certification. In addition, many modern scooters also have cleaner-running four stroke engines and even the two stroke engines are cleaning up their act. It is true, though, that this is something to look at carefully when purchasing a scooter.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but the Vespa GTS 250i.e. engine specs materials say this: "...a liquid-cooled engine and electronic injection system with three-way catalytic converter...". What's this about not having a catalytic converter?

jump to top ian says:

Things like the average gas mower or roto-tiller will produce more CO2 emissions and other horrible pollutants per litre used then per litre used in most vehicles.

The amount of CO2 emissions per litre of a given fuel is constant, not variable.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Modern scooters are some of the cleanest, most fuel efficient modes of transportation you can currently purchase. While older scooters do pollute with their uncatalyzed 2-strokes these engines all but disappeared during the mid-80s when new laws were enacted. These laws actually lead to Vespa's absence from the US market for over ten years until they came out with their current generation of low-emission four stroke Vespas, which like as the author has stated, even meet stringent California board standards. Vespa even developed a cylinder injected 2-stroke for the 50cc market (making it virtually as clean as a 4-stroke) and catalyzed their aging PX150 2-stroke scooter which has been in production since the late 70s.

And while vintage scooters are hardly clean, they have seen improvements with the development of synthetic oil which practically everyone in the scene uses.

The only scooters to watch out for these days are the cheap chinese pieces of crap that get imported by the container load. Among the many other problems these scooters have is the fact that many are coming across with forged EPA and CARB certifications and in fact do not meet them, many of them lacking the necessary emissions controls.

jump to top VespaMatt says:

65mpg out of a 250cc engine doesn't sound that great to me.

jump to top DanTH says:

I love it when people accuse others of not understanding, while themselves getting the facts wrong.

It doesn't get much greener than a vespa, even if the "only" get 65-90 miles per gallon.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Emission standards for motorcycles and scooters are much more lax than for automobiles, trucks, and SUVs. The carbon monoxide limit, for example, is 19.3 grams per mile, whereas the worst emissions category for autos, trucks, and SUVs is 4.2 grams per mile. NOx isn't even regulated below 280cc, and things like PM aren't regulated no matter the engine size.

jump to top Anonymous says:

My 125cc scooter, which is CARB rated and does have a catalytic convertor, gets over 80mpg.

Even if it emits four times the NOx and particulate per gallon burned of a car that gets 20mpg, it's still better than that.

And a lot more fun to drive!

jump to top Icelander says:

My 33,000 mile 1991 Honda 750 cc Nighthawk gets 45-50 mpg. I think it's about 400 pounds by itself.
My bicycle on the other hand . . .

Good Luck
vsk

jump to top vsk says:

VespaMatt - where can I find more info on the catalyzed engines? I have an old vespa that I don't ride because of the emissions from the two stroke engine. If I could convert it, I'd be back on it in a second!

jump to top barold says:

Buy electric. It is way better for the environment.

I just started reading treehugger and I will stop very quickly if they run these types of contests. You're making advertising dollars from it and the product is damaging the environment.

If treehugger continues to have these types of contests for items that damage the environment I am gone and will tell everyone I know and cares.

What a scam!


------------------------
author's note:

Just for clarification, this contest is not run by or has anything to do with TreeHugger. We were simply highlighting Vespa's Go Green contest. And, I for one would love to see more, better and affordable electric scooters.

jump to top Michael says:

Buy electric. It is way better for the environment.

I just started reading treehugger and I will stop very quickly if they run these types of contests. You're making advertising dollars from it and the product is damaging the environment.

If treehugger continues to have these types of contests for items that damage the environment I am gone and will tell everyone I know and cares.

What a scam!

jump to top Michael says:

Thank you for the "authors note on clarification" and I am happy to have such a quick response.

If a product is not ideal for the environment (which the Vespa is not) and it consumes gasoline and emits a large carbon footprint then you should not be showing it on this site (in my mind.)

I have been looking for a site like yours with the hopes of it actually portraying what it's name means but I am already having second thoughts. If you are going to have contests for Vespas because it directly targets one of your marketed age groups I am gone. Why not call up an electric bike company or better yet a bicycle company to do a contest and set an even better example or even better just ask people to walk.

Your name, treehugger, advocates to me that you are serious about the environment and having Vespa contests portray that you are not.

jump to top Michael says:

Michael,

Perhaps you're not clear on who's giving away the Vespa. Vespa is giving away the Vespa. Treehugger.com isn't, and it's not their contest. They're just writing a news story about it. This is similar to when a newspaper reports that a local businessperson is running a contest...the newspaper isn't involved except in reporting it.

Now, maybe Vespa paid Treehugger.com to promote the contest. If they did, then there's a conflict of interests. I'm not aware of this being the case, though. If you want to comment on the fact that Treehugger.com shouldn't be promoting Vespa's greenwashing of their vehicles, you've got plenty of room to talk, but Treehugger.com isn't running this contest. They're just linking to it.

For the record, I'd rather see a sea of Vespas than a sea of cars, though.

Yes, I am sorry to repeat what I said in my first posting. I do know that treehugger is not putting the contest on. I did not mean to put that in again.

I apologize for mentioning this again.

jump to top Micahel says:

Some of you who think you are actual treehuggers because you log on to treehugger.com are a bunch of self-righteous whiners.

Here's my faves:

"...What people don't understand is that these small, high MPG engines are usually totally unenforced when it comes to their emissions. With no catalytic converter these small engines are producing a large amount of pollutants. So yes, they use very little gas to propel it around the streets...they also do so very inefficiently."

-inefficient? Getting 65-90 mpg is pretty effing efficient to me! Unregulated? Hardly! Maybe if you live in BF Oklahoma. It's not like its a SUV with crummy CAFE standards".

"Emission standards for motorcycles and scooters are much more lax than for automobiles, trucks, and SUVs. The carbon monoxide limit, for example, is 19.3 grams per mile, whereas the worst emissions category for autos, trucks, and SUVs is 4.2 grams per mile. NOx isn't even regulated below 280cc, and things like PM aren't regulated no matter the engine size."

-I'll assume you are correct, so what? How many motorcycles and scooters are clogging up the freeways jamming all this crap into the air? Which makes your argument totally insignificant. Why bother jacking up the motorcycle manufacturers when the SUVs are sitting there ruining our air anyway? So your argument is SUVs better than scooters for the environment?

"65mpg out of a 250cc engine doesn't sound that great to me"

-How does this sound then "Light trucks that exceed 8,500 lbs gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) do not have to comply with CAFE standards. These vehicles include pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and large vans." We are talking less than 10 mpg!

"Buy electric. It is way better for the environment."

-Were is all this free energy coming from there Michael? There is an impact to you plugging your car in.

"If a product is not ideal for the environment (which the Vespa is not) and it consumes gasoline and emits a large carbon footprint then you should not be showing it on this site (in my mind.)"
-I drive a 4T Bajaj Cheetak wich gets around 90 mpg. I bet my carbon footprint is smaller than yours! Even if you take the bus! What would the carbon footprint of a building a bunch of power plants to power your electric car be?

Help the planet:
Move closer to your work, walk, bike, public transportation. Stop breeding. Do yourself in.

jump to top a vespa rider says:

One of the problems with scooters, aside from the potentially bad emissions is that a lot of folks who might get one (like me) are not replacing with it a car, but instead will ride their gas burning scooter instead of walking, riding a bike, or using public transportation.

There are scooters other than Vespa being produced that are FAR more efficient, you just might not get the same hipster points. If you're willing to put the environment before your ego, check out the Yamaha C3 or Vino. 4 strokes with catalytic converters, both get around 110 miles per gallon. Both can be had for $2000. There's also a 125cc version of the Vino, 4 stroke, that gets around 85 miles per gallon and looks much like a Vespa. Also check out the Honda scooters as well. I purchased the Yamaha C3 about 6 months ago and only use my car for longer trips now. Call me crazy, but I'd say getting 4x the gas mileage and producing 1/3 the amount of Co2 is a damn good start.

jump to top Aaron K says:

Apologies, in my previous post I stated "Both can be had for $2000." I meant to say "Each can be had for $2000".

jump to top Aaron K says:

I have searched and searched and nowhere does it say how much they cost. Can anyone help me?

jump to top Abby says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads