most popular:
100s of Dead Penguins



most popular: She Can Burn Her Water


most popular:
Affordable Electric Car


th comments
RemyC said: "I read somewhere today that the German government changed its mind, and will indeed shut down all their nukes by 2020, if not indeed sooner...." [read]

RemyC said: "That's sweet revenge, considering GM/Chevron conspired to pin Panasonic down to the ground by preventing them from continuing to make Nickel Metal ..." [read]

RemyC said: "hey bikesaddle, you really can't tell when someone's kidding, can you? have you seen alter eco? this week they launched an organic jean collection,..." [read]

Chat sohbet said: "Thank you guys Good post..." [read]

ARP said: "I would not ban them as I think it a bit overboard. I would charge for them or tax them. It's a win-win for most cities: they get more money and fe..." [read]

Rash of Mining Claims Threatens Grand Canyon and Other Natural Monuments

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 08.18.07
Business & Politics

grand canyon

The last few years have witnessed an unpredented land rush with mining companies eagerly staking thousands of new claims in areas bordering on some of the country's most prized natural treasures — including the Grand Canyon, Yosemite and Joshua Tree National Parks. Indeed, a new analysis of government records by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has revealed that the total number of active claims has risen from 207,540 in January 2003 to 376,493 in July 2007, an 80% increase. Stoked by a large increase in global demand for metals, mining companies are staking thousands upon thousands of claims for gold, copper, uranium and other metals.

Because the U.S.'s original mining law, which was enacted in 1872, offered very little protection for lands — essentially prioritizing the interests of mining companies over those of the public — many have argued for a fundamental overhaul in its provisions to bring it up to date. As Dusty Horwitt — an EWG Public Lands analyst and the report's author — put it to us, reforms in the legislation need to be implemented to at least place mining on the same level as other extractive practices.

Active claims increased more than 80% since January 2003

According to the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), metals mining is the country's leading source of toxic pollution, a dubious distinction the industry has held for 8 consecutive years (1998 - 2005). In addition, the EPA estimates that more than 40% of Western watersheds have contamination in their headwaters as a result, and that the total clean up cost of mining sites in the West could be $32 billion or more.

With mining interests staking an ever increasing number of claims within a few miles of our national parks — 2,901 since January 2003 — it has become more critical than ever for us to act and urge Congress to take steps to limit this unfettered, massive land grab. Fortunately, the House is getting ready to take up a bill introduced by Chairman of the Resources Committee Nick Rahall (D - WV), H.R. 2262, which would finally put an end to the mining interests' priority status.

The EWG has its own exhaustive list of recommendations for countering the growing influence of mining companies — including setting up an abandoned mine cleanup fund, requiring interests to make royalty payments to taxpayers and enacting tougher standards for mine cleanup. For the full list and to read the rest of the report (including an informative Google map listing all the mining claims and their locations relative to national parks), check out EWG's mining database.

Via ::Environmental Working Group: Mining Law Threatens Grand Canyon, other Natural Treasures (executive summary)

See also: ::Coal Executive Attacks Global Warming With His Miners Trapped Below, ::"Toxic West Virginia" from ViceTV: Coal Mining, ::China's Coal Industry: The Waste Has Us Gasping

Images courtesy of EWG and Nogwater via flickr


Comments (3)

so, why aren't we all screaming to push for solar to replace this deadly, environmentally destructive coal mining crap? if coal is responsible for 80% of global warming, and i mining is incredibly dangerous to humans and the planet, then where is the batte cry to stop black coal death and start sunshine powered life?

call your congressional rep and demand to know when HR 550 will be out of committee so we can have the tax breaks all these energy purveyors already get. we could all enjoy energy independence, freedom from the Enron's of the world, an 80% reduction in emissions and stop kiling miners, iraqis, plants, animals, and ourselves.

if not now, when?

jump to top sheila says:

The article appears to be discussing mining for metals as opposed to coal. However much I would like to see ever increasing recycling of metals (better economically as well as environmentally), I don't think we will get past the need to mine for these ores in the near future.

jump to top Old_Wolf [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Northern Colorado is currently fighting to prevent in situ uranium mining. Go to http://www.savecoloradoresources.com for links to organizations fighting this move. Help us protect the resources of Northern Colorado. I believe that there is no safe way to mine uramium and that nuclear energy is not the answer to global warming or oil shortages.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads