th comments
blindflacker said: "Great for bike shop owners/employees or bike messengers, but I doubt many employers would go thru the hassle for a standard commuter. As I take it ..." [read]

Anthony said: "I manufacture solar window fans with a relatively very cheap manufacturing price. Feel free and welcome to email me if you are interest to purchase..." [read]

Raiyn said: "@ Steven The article says "an unnamed private sector partner" This clearly means that the information either wasn't provided to the author..." [read]

thespyofcharles said: "innovative... nice... but question: I thought a weakness of PV's were that they only generate as much power as the area of the panel ..." [read]

gdavis said: "Try a masonry stove. Rob Roy of Earthwood Building School in NY has a couple of great books Mortgage Free! and Underground Living. He uses 2-3 co..." [read]

Carbon Footprint of Tap Water

by Matthew Sparkes, London, UK on 08. 2.07
Food & Health

484742414_2a624ade8f.jpg

No, we're not saying that water is something to avoid. But, out of curiosity, what is the carbon footprint of tap water? This was the question posed to the Guardian today by a reader, "Watching those pictures of water being pumped out of flood-stricken areas got me thinking: how much energy does it take to produce all our mains water?"

Leo Hickman explains that every day the UK uses 19 billion litres of tap water, and every year we use seven cubic kilometres. I know that's an odd metric to use, but think about it - that's enormous. Of course, much of this is wasted, either through leaking pipes or by us, in our houses.

Processing and serving us water uses between 2 and 3% of all electricity in the UK, and creates 0.5% of our carbon emissions. Crunching these considerable numbers, Hickman concludes that a litre of water has a footprint of 0.298 grammes, and says, "even if you had one very full bath - about 150 litres - every day for a year, overall it would represent just 15kg of greenhouse gas emissions. That's about what the average car produces over 80 kilometres."

However, if you add the cost of heating that water, and the fact that the country is often in periods of drought, then it still makes sense to use as little water as possible. ::The Guardian ::Image Source

Comments (2)

Gee, isn't there a cost associated with treating those 7 cubic km of water after it goes down the drain? Isn't this only half the story?

jump to top Mark Barnette says:

Yeah, this is only half of the story. But I couldn't imagine it costing much more to process the water than it does to produce and transport it.

jump to top Simon says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads