th comments
Martin said: "I love Greenpace. Negative advertising however is old school. When you tell the child, "Don't spill the miik" the child's brain first pictures sp..." [read]

tom_thinks said: "I was psyched when I saw this headline, as i'm pretty broke right now, but i'm a bit disappointed after reading the article. I spent about $2-3/mon..." [read]

Matt said: "Bristle at the aesthetics if you want, but more milk from fewer cows means less manure (e.g. nitrates) eutrophying water ways and less grain that h..." [read]

Brian Clark said: "According to the following: "many car makers are doing R&D.....We'll have to wait and see." It will never happen!!! ...unle..." [read]

Ben said: "There is a good reason most of these early industrial engine designs never took off. Not all good ideas can jump through the technical hoops that ..." [read]

AutoRucksack: A Backpack for Your Car

by Collin Dunn, Corvallis, OR, USA on 08. 3.07
Cars & Transportation

autorucksack-windtunnel.jpg

One consequence of smaller cars like the Toyota Yaris and Honda Fit -- which TreeHugger loves -- is that they have a bit less capacity for hauling stuff. While not a huge problem when you're driving back and forth to work (for most of us), it can make it tougher to put a load of gear in the back before heading off for a long weekend at the beach (or wherever your plans may take you). One German company has realized this problem, and come up with a solution: the Auto Rucksack, which is exactly what it sounds like. The waterproof backpack for your car rests comfortably off the back, which, as you can see in the above picture, doesn't add drag to your car (and decrease gas mileage) like a roof-rack-based system would. As an added benefit, when not in use, the rucksack adds virtually no weight to your car when not in use; the caveat is that it makes it pretty tough (okay, virtually impossible) to see out the back, but that's what the side-views are for, right? Wonder if they make a solar version? ::AutoRucksack via ::AutoblogGreen and ::Gizmag

Comments (7)

clever idea, but its terribly for visibility. the thing blocks off the entire rear window.

jump to top jro says:

Why couldn't you lengthen the top straps and slide it down below the rear window. Or even make a small platform on the rear bumper like those that plug into t atrailer hitch receiver.

jump to top Eugene says:

it looks like it kills a LOT of visibility. will it be worth it with increased accidents?? How many treehuggers have driven with mirrors only?

jump to top T. says:

As long as you're not parallel parking, driving with only side mirrors isn't too difficult. And, let's be honest, if the trunk is filled with stuff you'd be driving without your rear-view mirror anyway!

jump to top Icelander says:

It look more dangerous than is worth to me.I will stick with my detachable roof rack.It gives up to much visibility.Most people can not drive on mirrors alone.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Hatchbacks have flat backs for a reason. A car either has to be very long or end sharply and abruptly at the back to be aerodynamic. Long cars are not light enough to be fuel efficient in most cases, so the flat back is the best solution. The Toyota Prius is a good example of this design. Having a bump creates more drag, which can put a damper on milage.

If I'm wrong, correct me. The design is called a Kammback, I just found out. Here's the wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kammback

It'd be interesting to see how this stacks up compared to a roof-rack, milage-wise. I understand this isn't an everyday thing, but I think this looks inefficient and dangerous. Cute idea, though.

jump to top Tim says:

All fun and games till the rear door comes off...

jump to top Unpro says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads