most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Ailsa Ek said: "What on earth is gained for society by treating people as interchangeable parts in a machine? Strongly agreed. We are more that jus..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "JC, Alec, "silly", "ijiot", "nincompoop", all used at one time or another by the one and only Bugs Bunny. If those terms so complet..." [read]

Peaceful Disorder said: "I am so happy to see the options on organic cotton products growing past just basic clothing. I look forward to the day when all cotton is organic..." [read]

Nudger said: "Vanno - based on hundreds of user-submitted stories and thousands of votes - agrees that Apple should rank low in environmental performance (despi..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the suggestions listed is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is strapped beyond all experienc..." [read]

97.4% Net Energy Savings from Reusing Cotton Clothing: LCA & The Salvation Army

by Jenna Watson, Barcelona on 06. 5.07
Fashion & Beauty

salvation_army_lca2.jpg

We all know that second-hand clothing can be cool, stylish, fun and green. Some smart Brits took the time to evaluate the actual energy savings derived from clothing re-use, giving us numbers to justify our pledge for donating and recycling those unwanted garments. The The Salvation Army Trading Company Limited (SATCOL) along with University College Northampton and Environmental Resources Management carried out a life cycle assessment to “determine whether the recycling of clothes, shoes and textiles actually results in a net energy benefit.” Their findings were published in Resources, Conservation and Recycling [2006 (46): 94-103].

This streamlined LCA focuses on the energy consumption for the clothing recycling activity at SATCOL and quantifies the clothing recycling energy footprint of the organization. They calculated energy consumption for 1 tonne of recycled clothing by quantifying the energy, fuels and materials consumption for the year 2000/2001. The major energy consumer within the operation comes from their internal transport system for collection and distribution of donated items and they calculate that the energy required to recycle a tonne as being 1697 kWh, while the energy to create 1 tonne of cotton garments from virgin materials is 66648 kWh and 91508 kWh for a polyester garment. To calculate the net energy savings the study deducts the energy used to reuse or recycle 1 tonne of clothing from the energy used to manufacture it from virgin materials. The astonishing result is that:

The reuse of 1 tonne of polyester garments only uses 1.8% of the energy required for manufacture of these goods from virgin materials and the reuse of 1 tonne of cotton clothing only uses 2.6% of the energy required to manufacture those from virgin materials.

What an incredible net energy savings. The study notes that in 2003/2004 SATCOL received 23,000 tonnes of textiles (75 million individual items), 27% higher than 2000/2001. SATCOL receives 10-15 % of all the clothing, shoes, textiles and accessories donated each year in the UK. They run 38 charity shops in the UK and also transport clothing to parts of the world that need low cost clothing. So keep buying second-hand clothing when you get that urge for a new garment and keep donating when you grow tired of that clothing in your closet. Not only are you helping clothing reach people in need, you are saving an incredible amount of energy and environmental impact. Read the entire article here:: How to Green Your Wardrobe . More recycled clothing here and here. Image credit: The Freelance Star.

Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:



    Comments (2)

    At NYU, the style-conscious kids are all about vintage. One young lady I know sports an embroidered whipcord jacket that we researched on the internet, and we found was well over 100 years old, tailored in Vienna.

    I have a Pendleton shirt that's been out of production for 50 years.

    If you buy quality stuff, it grows more beautiful with age. And imagine how much money you save over time, even if you pay more up front.

    jump to top rob says:

    WOW that is just sweet but not in a good way
    WE NEED TO RECYCLE MORE CLOTHES!!!!!!

    jump to top mama says:

    Post a comment

    (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

    th ads
    th top picks
    th ads