most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Ailsa Ek said: "What on earth is gained for society by treating people as interchangeable parts in a machine? Strongly agreed. We are more that jus..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "JC, Alec, "silly", "ijiot", "nincompoop", all used at one time or another by the one and only Bugs Bunny. If those terms so complet..." [read]

Peaceful Disorder said: "I am so happy to see the options on organic cotton products growing past just basic clothing. I look forward to the day when all cotton is organic..." [read]

Nudger said: "Vanno - based on hundreds of user-submitted stories and thousands of votes - agrees that Apple should rank low in environmental performance (despi..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the suggestions listed is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is strapped beyond all experienc..." [read]

GM Food Debates Heats Up with Global Warming

by Jasmin Malik Chua, Jersey City, USA on 06. 1.07
Food & Health

gmglobalwarming.jpg
Image credit: Jim Frazier

If you think the pro-genetically-modified-foods camp is pushy now, just wait till global warming starts razing the planet's surface, creating even harsher environments for food crops.

"Trying to grow plants in Australian conditions, as in many countries around the world where the conditions are harsh, is challenging, and it is likely to get harder under the effects of climate change," said Mark Tester, a plant-genomics researcher at the University of Adelaide in Australia and an Australian Research Council Federation Fellow.

Tester, who is decidedly on the side of GM foods, is working to identify genes responsible for making some plants more tolerable to hostile environments, including those afflicted by drought, salinity, and frost. The next step: moving these genes into plants for commercial production through conventional breeding and genetic-modification techniques.

No doubt Tester's interest is spurred by his homeland's increasing levels of salinity, which currently affects 5.7 million hectares of Australian soil and costs an estimated $270 million annually. Australia isn't the only nation in this predicament, Tester said. "Our results in the laboratory suggest great promise for the rapid development of crops with increased salt tolerance," he added.

"Genetic modification can help accelerate improvements in crop plants to enable them to better cope with the rapidly changing environment," he said. "There is no doubt that as farmers face reduced yields, they will need all the tools they can get to help them grow our food sustainably and economically. Genetic modification is one of those tools."

Despite Tester's enthusiasm, we're still iffy about GM technology, for reasons we've detailed before. You say to-may-to, we say to-mah-to. :: The University of Adelaide and :: Newswise

See also: :: Arguments Against GMOs, :: How Can We Make Sure We Stay GM-Free?, :: Extreme Makeover: Genetically Modified Apples, and :: Norway Seed Bank: A Hedge Against Food Loss

Comments (5)

People are always looking for the cheap way out. Over-irrigation was the cheap way out, and that caused salinity. GM is the cheap way out, and it's going to cut species diversity, leaving us even more susceptible to changes in climate, disasters, diseases, etc.

The answer is sourcing more naturally bred crops, not GM. Naturally bred seeds are far more adaptable and hardy, because GM engineers go after a specific desirable trait, not the whole spectrum of needed traits.

jump to top rob says:

horrible...

jump to top alex says:

I am growing my own food!

jump to top MC says:

While just the thought of genetically modified food makes me shudder, I wonder why such uncertainty surrounds these issues. I understand why it is important to look ahead and develop possible solutions, but I certainly believe in taking precautionary measures concerning any type of “new and improved” technology. It seems as though these GMO’s have been thrown onto shelves in our grocery stores without adequate research, and I would rather be safe than sorry.

I do think, however, that this could help push global warming and related issues to the forefront of the agenda. The fact that farmers and large companies are beginning to plan for potential weather patterns, caused by anthropogenic climate change, might give the non-believer a new frame of thought.

I am also wondering what local farmers/ small family farms that practice sustainable methods would think of this, and how things will change if and when global warming affects crops.

jump to top Rachel says:

foods that are from a science lab...............................................eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwww!!!

jump to top Ryan says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads