most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
hendu said: "At least the camera man can do basic math...." [read]

ricardo said: "I worked for a company called creativesignage.com and basically these thing really work. They do charge during the day with ambiant light e..." [read]

Digo said: "It's pretty clear on their website when they insist of the name " pedagogic " project. This project doesn't look like made to replace our com..." [read]

Andrew said: "Maybe people won't realsie how screwed the Earth is untill everything beautiful in it is gone. :( quite sad really takes destruction for realisatio..." [read]

Neil said: "Hi there all of you I just love this. Nuns have always been fun loving I'm so impressed with the news that you at Treehugger are..." [read]

Staber: Top Loader That Thinks its a Front Loader

by Warren McLaren, Sydney on 05.31.07
Design & Architecture (bathroom)

Staber-Washer.jpg

Normally I don’t pay much attention to television adverts. But recently I had to go through the process of buying a new washing machine, so it was with interest that I noticed Fisher&Paykel promoting their Aquasmart machine. The first top loader sold in Australia to qualify for a 4 Star water rating. Impressive, but the energy rating still needs work. Jogged the memory though. “Haven’t I seen a hybrid top loader before?” Of course I had. It was the Staber, launched onto the US market a full dozen or so years ago. Inside this normal looking top loader is a hexagonal-like stainless steel drum that opens to the top. Staber reckon their ’Made in America’ machines will provide a return of around $300 each year for the rest of their life. Although about twice the price of a standard top loader, they calculate that considering water, energy and detergent saved over just three years of use, you are pretty much making money with their designs. They figure this based on saving a third of the water, a quarter of the energy to heat water, at least a quarter of the washing detergent and a third of the drying time (due to their efficient spins cycle). The company even have some sound reasons why their design outperforms a front loader. Interestingly, for folk on wind and solar power, Staber also claim to have ‘the most energy efficient washer available and the best choice for consumers living "off-grid,"’ as a result of only needing 110–150 watt-hours of electricity per wash load. Not being in the US, I ultimately made a different choice, but would welcome comments below from anyone with experience (good or bad) on the effectiveness of the Staber design. ::Staber Washing Machines.

Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:



    Comments (1)

    I've had a Staber for the past 11 years. It gets a lot of use.

    Its capacity is great, you need very little soap, it treats the clothes well, and it spins most of the moisture out of them.

    Negatives:

    - It's very noisy, especially when it revs up to high-speed spin.

    - I've had to replace a lot of parts (pump, bearings, control board, soap dispenser, ...).

    But I've been able to do ALL of the repairs myself, even though I had never worked on appliances before, and the folks at Staber have been super about helping me out over the phone. It is an elegantly simple design.

    Overall, it's been a great investment.

    jump to top mwilliamr [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

    Post a comment

    (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

    th ads
    th top picks
    th ads