Opting Out Of Solar To Save Wildlife?
by Karin Kloosterman, Jerusalem, Israel on 05. 7.07
Some forward thinking folks at Israel’s Environment of Environmental Protection have earned the TreeHugger of the day award. Well, we don’t actually have the award, but we think we should when we read news like this from the Haaretz: a massive solar energy project has been criticized for its potential to seriously endanger Israel’s precious wildlife.
In many countries the environment minister promotes clean energy projects from sources like the sun or wind, and demands large areas for this purpose. That is not the case in Israel, where this month Environmental Protection Minister Gideon Ezra announced his opposition to the major solar energy project at Mishor Yamin near Dimona.
Ezra, it is reported, touts environmental reasoning for his opposition. The site of the proposed solar harvesting facility near Dimona would cross about 1,000 acres of land. Rising six to seven meters, the solar panels could damage the plains in the Negev – home to rare flora and fauna habitats. Some of the species are only found in Israel such as the Negev iris. ::Haaretz
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- How to Find Green Energy Anywhere
- 1 GW Solar Power Project Announced in China, Timetable Unknown
- Dongtan, China's Flagship Ecocity Project, R.I.P.
- Is Toyota Hot on the Trail of a Solar Powered Car?

























Is it windy there?
These large-scale solar installations will have an impact. For this reason, PVs on the roofs of homes may be a better idea. There's no endangered plants on our roofs, and less need for expensive transmission infrastructure. Of course, economies of scale will be less, but the cost of PVs is going to be high wherever you put them.
Utilities have underwriting programs to help you buy efficient furnaces. Maybe they should have the same for home PV units. The extra cost would be the installations.
im sure the cities in Israel cover more than 1000 sqft. Put the panels on rooftops.