th comments
amethystshadows said: "I also live in Maine, in a late 1800s house, around 1900 square feet. We have a woodstove in the basement, with air ducts to the first floor. We ..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "James, I don't necessarily disagree with you. But right now, our culture is akin to an alcoholic who thinks that simply cutting back a bit..." [read]

Doug said: "But doesn't all that movement of the wood keep you warmer? :)..." [read]

Eddy De Clercq said: "Question of course what happens with the recycled stuff. As mentioned in this <a href="http://www.grumpyoldman.be/green-money/" rel="nofollow..." [read]

Andrew said: "wow, oops. I usually end up riding on the sidewalk through there. It never even registered that that bike lane is special...I'm so spoiled in Bou..." [read]

Nuclear Geriatrics: "Bury The Old" To Build The New

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 05.25.07
Business & Politics

oldbury.jpgBritish nuclear engineers are set to follow the path of all ancient architects. "All but one of Britain's nuclear power stations will be shut by 2023, and the government insists it must make a decision this year on whether to build new nuclear power plants...The complete Oldbury [plant] shutdown will cost around 1 billion pounds and could take 110 years, nearly three times longer than the plant has been in operation...Decommissioning [all the] aging nuclear plants, like 40-year-old Oldbury in western England, and storing their toxic waste will cost around 70 billion pounds ($138.3 billion), according to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority." In announcing the decision to indeed build more reactors this week, the government spokesman stated "it would make sense for any new nuclear plants to be built alongside existing ones, because all the necessary infrastructure and links to the National Grid were already there." Did they really mean they would bury the old plant's hot carcass aside a new one? If so, this could become common practice wherever aging nuclear plants must be decommissioned, including in North America - as long as no one can agree on a central repository for radiological waste. Once this prospect sinks in to the public consciousness, public licensing hearings will be, shall we say, "heated." Semantic aside: the namesake town is Oldbury - Old Bury, get it? Via:: Scientific American Image credit: Oldbury Plant NukeWorker

Comments (1)

This is really a case of "bury the old junk to build new junk".

Nuclear reactors may be here to stay for a while but they are about as welcome as a thorn in the foot. It would seem that with so many ways of producing clean energy without worring about radiation, this dangerous type of technology would die out but it is like the flu and is always spreading. I read recently that a total of about 900 nuclear plants worldwide are being planned for 2020 but I would classify this situation as 900 permanent headachs.

adrianakau@aol.com

jump to top Adrian Akau says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads