th comments
racetoinfinity said: "I want to simply say, that at this late date, I can't believe the deniers of human caused climate change. Willful ignorance!..." [read]

Kylie Wrath said: "Whether or not leather is a product or by-product is irrelevant: there are tons of people who buy it regardless. I think the fact that this company..." [read]

thespyofcharles said: "hmm... perhaps i shall reconsider my excessive gift packaging gag i was planning... or maybe do it out of old boxes that would otherwise simply hav..." [read]

mike said: "I think it is humerous at the record losses posted at GM. They really had the jump on technoligy with the EV1 but decided to put all their effort i..." [read]

Louise White said: "I have a 2002 Prius with 143,000 miles on it. Recently I started checking on my trade in value for a new Prius. Every sales person told me that I..." [read]

Genetics and Environmental Science: A Sensible Combination

by Jeremy Elton Jacquot, Los Angeles on 05.18.07
Science & Technology

biohazard.jpgAt first blush, it would certainly seem as though genetics and environmental science, even in the context of environmentally-induced human diseases, share little in common. Whereas researchers in the field of genetics have primarily focused their efforts on understanding and finding genetic factors for inheritable diseases, those in the latter discipline have been trying to identify diseases whose etiology lies in a variety of environmental factors, such as exposure to contaminated samples of air and water or to chemical pollutants.

Spurred in part by concerns over climate change and worsening environmental conditions, there is new a drive to reconcile advances made in these separate disciplines by placing a stronger emphasis on understanding how genetic factors and environmental exposures interact to induce adverse effects and prompt disease development in otherwise healthy individuals. One potential solution: sensor technologies that could provide accurate quantitative measures of chemical and biological hazards or that could characterize the "biological fingerprint" left by a particular class of environmental stressors.

New sensing technologies derived from advances made in nanotechnology and nanoengineering, medical diagnostics and biodefense could be adapted for use in the exposure sciences. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), which are artificial receptors, could act as surrogates for recognition mediators in the body such as antibodies and cells. If designed correctly, they would have three main advantages: ease-of-use, portability and lack of constant monitoring through sample processing and analysis in a laboratory.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently embraced this approach by launching the Genes, Environment, and Health Initiative (GEI), which seeks to develop new non-invasive instruments and biomarkers to assess interactions between environmental exposures and genetic variations that lead to human disease. With progress in the field still in its infancy, the NIH has started several new programs, with a focus on environmental genomics, to train a generation of scientists that will be comfortable straddling both disciplines.

::MEDICINE: Environmental Biology and Human Disease, ::Israel & US: Really, Really Small Ways For Purifying Water
See also: ::Greenwashing Versus Voluntary Pollution Prevention: A Test Of Global Understanding, ::Blood Levels Of Flame Retardants Correlate With House Dust Exposure

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads