Cost of Mitigating Global Warming: $10/Person?

by Jeff McIntire-Strasburg, St. Louis, MO on 05.11.07
Business & Politics

piggybank.JPGLast week's report by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claimed that the cost of stabilizing CO2 emissions would be .12% of the annual gross domestic product. On it's face, that doesn't sound like much, but what does it actually mean in terms of dollars and cents? Our friends at DeSmogBlog did some calculating. Writer Kevin Grandia offers the following figures:

GDP of the world economy: US$60 trillion

.12% of $60 trillion: $70 billion

Total population of the earth: 6.5 billion

Cost per person to significantly reduce heat-trapping gas worldwide: $10 a year

Cost of saving the planet from droughts, famine, mass flooding, species extinction and rising sea levels: priceless. ...

Here's the math: $60 trillion/.0012/6.5 billion = 10 (rounded figures)

Not bad, huh? Obviously, no government or entity will be sending out bills for $10 to every person on the planet, but that figure serves the very useful purpose of countering arguments that claim climate change mitigation would wreck developed economies. Given the economic damage that could occur from rising sea levels, more severe weather events, and crop failures, this seems like a genuine bargain. We're almost certain you have thoughts on this... ::DeSmogBlog

Image source: DeSmogBlog

Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!

Comments (13)

That's with an average yearly salary of $9,000. $10 is a lot of money for a large chunk of the world. To be fair, individuals would pay 0.12% of their own salary. If you make $50,000 a year, your portion would be $60.

jump to top Josh says:

Developing nations played very little role in creating the problem. I am assuming that the .012% GDP means that such a cost would not be tied to the population but the economy, so in the US it would be around $45 per person ($12 trillion GDP x .012% = $144 billion/30 million people = $478 per person).

Whereas, say a developing nation like Gambia with a GDP of $3billion and a population of 1.5 million would pay about $2 per person.

No matter how it's sliced, developed nations pay more. But overall $10 per head gives you a good idea of how affordable the solutions are.

As the article said; 6.5 billion people will not receive individual invoices. The cost per person is for perspective and it is as irrelevant as the cost per country and whether developed countries have a different responsibility from developing countries. Also for perspective is the $2-billion that US taxpayers spend every week in Iraq. For the cost of 30 weeks worth of quagmire, global CO2 levels could be stabilized.

jump to top Gary Paudler says:

the math is wrong.
60 trillion * .0012 / 6.5 billion = 10

jump to top Anonymous says:

great idea to put things into perspective. who should i make the cheque out to?

jump to top Andy Chong says:

Putting that into perspective with the Iraq war just shows how absolutely absurd that whole situation has become. Unbelievable

jump to top kirk says:

As pointed out above, a vast part of the world doesn't have to money to pay this. 10 dollars US might be a weeks wages, if not longer in many countries.

Coincidentally (or not) these people are most likely to be affected by global warming.

jump to top Anonymous says:

I just don't find this cost statement credible. For starters the bank that will lend the power company 5 billion for a new coal plant is not going to lend out the same money for solar panels.

Our current economy hase perverse incentives that make things like installing a black roof in the desert cheaper (for the builder) even when that black roof will add 40% to the buildings cooling cost for 25 years.

Look out your window and count black roofs. Then listen to the hum of all those air conditioners next July. Ten dollars doesn't replace a bad roof.

jump to top Pangolin says:

"Cost of Mitigating Global Warming: $10/Person"

This is as incorrect as it appears.

jump to top Manu Sharma [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

This is as incorrect as it appears.

Really? So how much is it in reality?

jump to top Pat says:

CHANGE OVER YOUR ROOFS TO BLUE POLY-CHRYSTALINE SOLAR PANELS, IT WILL COOL DOWN YOUR ROOF AND SAVE YOU MONEY ON YOUR ELECTRIC BILL. CLICK BELOW.

Please stop spamming this website.

Thank you.

jump to top Bob says:

Something is wrong with your math. I have heard the experts predict a 80% increase in household electric bills from carbon capping.

I know for me personally this would be almost $70 per month! So how can you make this $10 claim?

Maybe many of those 6.5 billion people will not be paying anything?

Something is way off in your math.

jump to top Heather says:

So if it is that cheap, then why is it that proposed gasoline taxes come to more then $10 per full up, the cost increases expected for all products we buy do to shipping costs comes to well over $10 in any given month and the cost of electricity is projected to increase by 80%.

$10 per person is a fantasy! That would not even cover the carbon foot print for the scientist who use our tax money already just to study global warming!

jump to top Heather says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)