th comments
Martin said: "I love Greenpace. Negative advertising however is old school. When you tell the child, "Don't spill the miik" the child's brain first pictures sp..." [read]

tom_thinks said: "I was psyched when I saw this headline, as i'm pretty broke right now, but i'm a bit disappointed after reading the article. I spent about $2-3/mon..." [read]

Matt said: "Bristle at the aesthetics if you want, but more milk from fewer cows means less manure (e.g. nitrates) eutrophying water ways and less grain that h..." [read]

Brian Clark said: "According to the following: "many car makers are doing R&D.....We'll have to wait and see." It will never happen!!! ...unle..." [read]

Ben said: "There is a good reason most of these early industrial engine designs never took off. Not all good ideas can jump through the technical hoops that ..." [read]

Rolf Disch's Heliotrop House

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 04.13.07
Design & Architecture

helio2.jpgOur head is spinning from all the rotating buildings. Architect Rolf Disch built his own home as a test bed for solar systems. The house tracks the sun, so that its triple-glazed front can face the warming sun in winter and show its well insulated back in summer. The balcony rail is a solar vacuum tube to heat water. Photovoltaics on the roof rotate independently to track the sun, generating four to six times the energy needed for the house, making it beyond zero energy and into "das Plusenergiehaus" or a "Plus-energy House." If that is not enough, there is on-site composting, chemical free sewage treatment and rainwater catchment.

The house has been the personal residence of the Architect since 1994. ::Azure Magazine Green Revolution Issue

helio%20interior.jpg

Comments (6)

thats pretty stunning. if only this kind of technology could compete with the price of "conventional" buildings

jump to top Nature's Graffiti says:

only took them about 50 years to recreate the jetsons house.

jump to top toyotaboy says:

I agree, a stunning house. But you don't need a rotating house to achieve virtually the same benefits as this house. A properly designed 'fixed' passive solar house gives practically the same benefits without the increased complexity inherent in a home that requires special systems and components to rotate - without mentioning the substantially increased costs that they entail. K.I.S.S, baby, K.I.S.S. It should be a fundamental priority in all design. Keep it simple.

jump to top houston says:

How much energy is used when turning the whole house? Would a sphere-shaped (stationery) solar panel not have been easier en more energy-efficient?

jump to top Martijn says:

Hi, I real want this house ! I'm crazy! It's possible?

Thanks you very much!

jump to top pedro says:

considering that the house only needs to be rotated 180 degrees two times a year, and that a small electric motor can easily do that without using much energy, the net savings in solar collecting and insulating value are stunning. as an added benefit, you gain a change of view and scenery twice a year.

I wonder how much Architect Rolf Dischspent spent on making this masterpiece?

jump to top John Taylor [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads