most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Jay said: "Sad story indeed. Unless we get the good fortune of offspring, Man will have yet again driven a species to extinction. Something it seem to be ve..." [read]

said: "OK, why isn't the option of voting to NOT tax gas guzzlers? There can be no shift to more fuel efficient vehicles unless more fuel efficient vehic..." [read]

Carl Trimble said: "I think its cell phone interference. If you talk to bees like I do, they hate cell phones. They want us to go back to land lines...." [read]

Used Pellet Stoves said: "Pellet Stoves are selling like hot cakes this year and I think the trend will continue to increase. Regards, Chris..." [read]

said: "I'm on disability income. My 17 year old vehicle is beginning to smoke. I don't continue to drive it because I'm ignorant. I continue to drive it b..." [read]

Fred's Footprint

by Matthew Sparkes, London, UK on 04.29.07
Business & Politics (news)

dn11359-1_600.jpg

New Scientist environment correspondent, Fred Pearce, is currently touring the world and investigating his own footprint, but from a global perspective. This week he is in Bangladesh, examining the conditions under which his jeans were produced. "These women work 10-hour days or more, making clothes in one of the sweatshop capitals of the world. I had come to find where the jeans I paid £9 (US$18) for in a British store came from. They came from women like these." 80% of Bangladesh's exports are from the clothing industry, and the women who produce these items earn just under US$1 a day. Pearce has previously traveled to Tanzania to investigate the source of his favorite fair-trade coffee, and to South Africa to see the conditions under which the gold for his wedding ring was mined. It's an important journey, and one that could help people to think about the impact of their purchases. Our disposable culture is not a sustainable one. Cheap goods may be good for the consumer, but are severely detrimental to our planet and to workers in developing countries. We must think about our purchases, and spend our money wisely, because it can influence what industry does. :: New Scientist

Comments (6)

is he traveling by plane and automobile examining his footprint? that's a lot of fossil fuel to find out who made his clothing and grew his coffee.

jump to top tim francis says:

This is probably the most brilliant thing I've read on Treehugger.

jump to top Lizzy says:

The one problem with this post is that it doesn't suggest any alternatives.

jump to top Scott says:

The alternatives are simply- Do our best to be less materialistic. I admire what he is doing. He's opening up our eyes. If only he could find a greener way to reach his destinations, but I'm sure he will. He may already be brainstorming the idea.

jump to top Gloria says:

We all started somewhere. If what he's doing is informing thousands and thousands of people about their footprint, great!

jump to top Anonymous says:

we already know the alternatives: American Apparel, Fair Trade, gold from reliable sources, etc., etc. I think people, especially those that read TreeHugger, know how to make changes in their lives when it comes to injustices, they just need to start by knowing that there are injustices and what they are. Spoon feeding everyone problems and solutions will never make for an effective way to have people make changes when they care. But opening people's eyes, like this man is doing and in the way that this man is doing is a really great step.

jump to top brownb3 says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads