most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Jay said: "Sad story indeed. Unless we get the good fortune of offspring, Man will have yet again driven a species to extinction. Something it seem to be ve..." [read]

said: "OK, why isn't the option of voting to NOT tax gas guzzlers? There can be no shift to more fuel efficient vehicles unless more fuel efficient vehic..." [read]

Carl Trimble said: "I think its cell phone interference. If you talk to bees like I do, they hate cell phones. They want us to go back to land lines...." [read]

Used Pellet Stoves said: "Pellet Stoves are selling like hot cakes this year and I think the trend will continue to increase. Regards, Chris..." [read]

said: "I'm on disability income. My 17 year old vehicle is beginning to smoke. I don't continue to drive it because I'm ignorant. I continue to drive it b..." [read]

Aviation Ads to Carry Cigarette-style Warnings?

by Sami Grover, Carrboro, NC, USA on 04. 8.07
Cars & Transportation (aviation)

Airplane%20Ads.jpg
Once again the aviation/climate change debate is hotting up, and once again, the UK is the scene for the latest installment. The Guardian reports that the Institute for Public Policy Research is urging advertising for flights, foreign holidays, and cars to carry cigarette-style advertising warning of the particular product's or service's greenhouse gas contribution:

“Clearly visible messages such as “Flying causes climate change” could put some consumers off air travel in the same way that smokers are deterred by health warnings on cigarette packets, a new report on global warming suggests. In addition to the warnings on adverts and at airports, carbon offsetting charges should be included in flight fares, with passengers forced to opt out rather than opt in, the Institute for Public Policy Research demanded in its latest report.”

While such a policy may raise awareness of transport related emissions, it’s hard to see how decisions would be made as to which industries would be targeted. If, for example, ads for airlines and cars were forced to carry such warnings, then why not concrete, meat, or any other carbon-intensive industry? It’s certainly an interesting idea, but this Treehugger suspects it will be a long time before we see it in practice. After all, it’s hard to imagine the folks at SPURT agreeing to voluntarily carry a climate warning on their advertising, given their ‘Screw Climate Change, Let’s Fly’ motto…

Comments (1)

Right, because the labels on cigarettes do so much good....

jump to top Anonymous says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads