A Bush Administration Policy Adjustment

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 04.22.07
Business & Politics

bald-eagle-head.jpg

Knowing many US citizens would be thinking about, you know..Earth, on the upcoming Earth Day, perhaps mid-March seemed like a good time to refresh some US Federal environmental policies. Associated Press, via MSNBC (March 28, 2007 ):- "Tired of losing lawsuits brought by conservation groups, the Bush administration issued a new interpretation of the Endangered Species Act that would allow it to protect plants and animals only in areas where they are struggling to survive, while ignoring places they are healthy or have already died out. The opinion by U.S. Department of Interior Solicitor David Bernhardt was posted with no formal announcement on the department's Web site on Friday." A spokesman for the Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson is quoted as saying the new policy would remove 80 percent of the roughly 1,300 species from threatened and endangered lists. We assume that by that characterization the Center spokesman means that, on average, up to 80% of the population totals for endangered species would be unprotected: an odd Earth Day present if this is even close to correct. Suppose such a policy had been in place when the Bald Eagle was originally declared endangered? More from the Tucson spokesman: "...as soon as you drive a population extinct (in a certain area) it is no longer on the table. It no longer counts toward whether a species is endangered." On the otherhand, if you live in northern Minnesota hey, and wolves eat your dog or cat, you might feel good about the unprotected option. Bam! Image credit: Micheal Melford, National Geographic.

Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!

Comments (3)

I saw a bumper sticker the other day that says it all, "To save a tree, remove a Bush". Mr. Bush's God said in Revelations, "I will destroy those who destroy the earth," As far as Bush is concerned, what is God waiting for?

jump to top Sharon Campshure says:

Does "Click here" realize that his/her company does not plan to start installing PV systems until just before bush leaves office, right?

jump to top Anonymous says:

This is very sad. It's also chutzpah. We can't worry about extinction because we killed most of them off.

It's true that endangered species have been somewhat eclipsed by greenhouse gases as an issue, but biodiversity is a serious issue too. More and more medicines and useful products are being discovered as we study the natural world more closely. And we need a legal regime that will protect that biodversity.

Also, a less biodiverse world is a world more subject to ecologial hazards like familne and disease. Natural populations provide barriers and reservoirs that buffer wild swings in microbe populations.

And it's just an ethical priority. But no one thinks about that anymore.

jump to top rob says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)