Sharing - It's The Party Line
by Mark Ontkush, Boston, Massachusetts, USA on 03. 5.07
Sharing is defined as non-exclusive access to a resource. As expected, sharing pops up pretty much everywhere - Chimps share meat, teenagers share music, toddlers teach themselves to share as they move out of parallel play. My grandma had a shared party line, a telephone that was connected to both her and her neighbor at the same time. Even the ultra rich share, say, a vineyard or a yacht once in a while.
Sharing saves resources, but also poses a few issues. Sometimes an single individual hogs the resource (the roommate who drank all the milk) or tries to profit off the joint labor that created it. Since sharing is a collective endeavor, it can pressure 'Us vs. Them' models considerably. This cultural disruption can be threatening - Hp, for example, sensing that sharing would cut into their profit margins, declared a war on sharing in 2002.
Be that as it may, sharing is everywhere in IT and is only going to increase. Most businesses already share networks, databases, servers because it simply makes sense - it would be silly for each user to have their own network, just as it would be silly for each automobile owner to have their own roads. Only the desktop PC, the proverbial car of the information superhighway, has not fallen into the shared realm.
But all that is changing rapidly. As resources draw scarce, IT sharing is going mainstream. With drastic budgetary reductions and the drive towards efficiency, CIOs are now looking to implement any technology that improves efficiency. And the solution is sharing - Virtualization is being used to share servers, and the shared desktop is here. At a larger scale, extranets, software as a service, and industry consolidation will continue, maybe until there are only five shared computers left in the world. When we get to that level of efficiency, we will have sustainable IT. And that's a party.





















Shared computing is a fine idea ... so long as it runs on Linux. I shudder at the disruption that would be caused by the technical difficulties which would arise from a thousand people sharing a Vista server.
Nick Kasoff
The Thug Report
Hi Nick,
Yes, that probably will be a result of moving to a shared environment, changing the operating system.
Mark
Those who ignore history tend to repeat it.
Shared computers, like multi-user Linux systems offer the same or better administration savings with substantially better performance than even virtualizing single user versions of the same Linux system. Your point about Vista is well taken. So, virtualizing is a net saving but it is a much lower net saving than going to true multi-user systems which have been around since the 1960s.
If you're going to take away their PC, give them something that's going to get you all the benefits. Just my humble opinion.