most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Jay Fretz said: "If "The motors do not drive the car, but kick in to provide a power boost...", then how can "Range on electric alone is expected to to be in the or..." [read]

Jay said: "Sad story indeed. Unless we get the good fortune of offspring, Man will have yet again driven a species to extinction. Something it seem to be ve..." [read]

said: "OK, why isn't the option of voting to NOT tax gas guzzlers? There can be no shift to more fuel efficient vehicles unless more fuel efficient vehic..." [read]

Carl Trimble said: "I think its cell phone interference. If you talk to bees like I do, they hate cell phones. They want us to go back to land lines...." [read]

Used Pellet Stoves said: "Pellet Stoves are selling like hot cakes this year and I think the trend will continue to increase. Regards, Chris..." [read]

Take the Google Line To Work

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 03.11.07
Cars & Transportation

googlebus.jpg

Google gets hugs for its solar panels, if less so then for their giant jet, but you know they are the real thing when they do the less obvious, more expensive and really effective things. They essentially have built a private transit system of 32 buses with leather seats, wireless internet and bicycle racks. “It’s the most useful Google fringe benefit,” said Wiltse Carpenter, a 45-year-old software engineer. It’s changed my quality of life” Riders can sign up to receive alerts on their computers and cellphones when buses run late and to top it off, they use biodiesel.

According to the Times, They pick up workers as far away as Concord, 54 miles northeast of the Googleplex, as the company’s sprawling Mountain View headquarters are known, and Santa Cruz, 38 miles to the south. The system’s routes cover in excess of 230 miles of freeways, more than twice the extent of the region’s BART commuter train system, which has 104 miles of tracks. ::New York Times

UPDATE: This very sensible letter by Dan Savage was published in the New York Times:

Here's an idea for Google: locate your offices near where people live rather than transporting them all over the San Francisco Bay area.

Most "Googlers" are young and live in San Francisco, where they can find affordable housing and enjoy an urban lifestyle. Surely Google can afford a high-rise office in downtown San Francisco.

Given the obvious need to curtail carbon dioxide emissions, enlightened companies should set an example by locating in downtown areas, where mass transit is ready and waiting.

Establishing corporate campuses in suburban communities like Mountain View, where only a handful of the richest Googlers can afford to live, and busing in thousands of urban employees, makes little sense in an environmentally challenged era.

Comments (3)

I wonder how the travel time compares to car travel? Some times no matter how ecologically sound private or public buses are, they waste another natural resource which we can't get back no matter how hard we try.... time.

I considered a public express bus when I started at my job 8 years ago. Started a few miles from my house and ended right at my employer's door, with only a few stops in between (thus the "express"). I could have sold my car and saved a few thousand each year as I saved my emissions.

The problem? A 45 minute one-way trip vs. 1 1/2 hours one-way on the bus. Mostly because it had to use non-interstate roads for most of its route to connect to the few other points on its route. My personal route was 95% on the interstate (which was easier on the car, too). I couldn't justify spending almost 8 extra days of my life per year on the bus... just like many people won't go back to trans-ocean ship travel even though it is better than air travel.

Hopefully the Google buses don't have the same lag problem.

jump to top Doug [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

I work at yahoo and we also have shuttles (biodiesel...but no leather seats) from SF (three routes in SF and two in the East Bay) Just to note, it is actually more expensive to live in San Francisco than the suburbs due to the high price of real estate and rent.

Anyway, there are about forty people on my bus every day and it adds about twenty minutes to my commute over driving. But it is so worth it, I just sleep on the way to work! Also, 'most' googlers and yahoos do not live in San Francisco. Most live in the San Jose/Mountain View/Sunnyvale area, so moving to SF would cause more people to drive farther (I would love it though). The reason for all this commuting is that people with families can't afford to live close to work and many people (like me) don't want to live in the suburbs. I don't own a car.

jump to top Stephen says:

Look, I may not have grown up in the bay area, I just go to SJSU, but from what I've seen, Santa Clara county has one of the most amazing public transportation systems I've seen.

jump to top LK says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads