most popular:
Green Your TP



most popular: i MiEV to Launch Early


most popular:
The Micro Compact Home


th comments
said: ""Compared to Canada, a country similar in population size (33.4 million people), California uses about 6 billion gallons more gas and diesel...." [read]

said: ""Horsepower is not impressive. Anyone can build a bigger motor. Efficiency, on the other hand, takes true talent." That's the beauty of ele..." [read]

Doug said: "Compared to Canada, a country similar in population size (33.4 million people), California uses about 6 billion gallons more gas and diesel. <..." [read]

Froggy said: "Icelander, it’s a matter of cost. Way things are looking now, more and more segments will be getting hybrids. The biggest issue is cost, as a hybri..." [read]

Robert Pritchett said: "I doubt it is crashworthy and may only allowed to be a NEV. No bumper says no go. Small tires says go-cart...." [read]

Stanford and Exxon Mobile Partnership: Donor Yanks Funds

by Mairi Beautyman, Berlin, Germany on 03.13.07
Business & Politics (news)

stanford_university.jpgStanford University and Exxon Mobile on the same team: Fishy business? According to a recent article in Mercury News, a big donor to Stanford is outraged over the school's partnership with the oil giant. Movie producer Steve Bing has already given the university $22.5 million, but after seeing a recent Exxon Mobile ad using the school's name, he yanked a promise for $2.5 million. "Exxon Mobil is trying to greenwash itself, and it's using Stanford as its brush," says Yusef Robb. (Bing would only speak through Robb, his collaborator for climate issues.) Stanford's prize? $100 million over 10 years. Thanks tipster John Laumer. :: Mercury News

Comments (1)

http://www.alaskareport.com/z45631.htm

For more than a decade, Exxon Corporation (now ExxonMobil) has waged a comprehensive campaign against punitive damages awards, triggered by the decision of a jury in Alaska to impose a $5 billion penalty on the company for the misdeeds that led to the Valdez oil spill, the worst in the nation's history. This campaign paid off handsomely in December 2006, when a federal appeals court reduced Exxon's punitive damages liability for the Valdez spill by $2 billion.

jump to top bwm says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads