New Deal II: The Next Dam Thing?
by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 03.15.07
Via Earthwatch Radio, the book "Big Dams of the New Deal Era: A Confluence of Engineering and Politics," by David P. Billington and Donald C. Jackson, University of Oklahoma Press (2006), reminded us about a couple of earlier posts on TreeHugger: like this one on a glut of green power in the US Pacific Northwest and especially this one, looking at the value of upgrading existing hydro facilities. Historian D.C. Jackson is quoted in the Earthwatch report as saying:- "...one of the legacies for New Deal projects in the '40s, '50s and '60s is the federal government becomes seen as the source of revenue for developing projects".
The obvious simile: if private sector investment and US Federal and state tax incentives appear insufficient to meet the challenge posed by Climate Change, do we create a New Deal II? And, if so, what sort of large-scale projects should be included in the New Deal Revival? Upgrading hydro plants -- not big enough. How about adding grid connections to the Saudi Arabia of wind (the Dakotas)? Important, but specialized, and without long term employment benefits. How about extensive reforestation projects, in parallel with numerous greenfield Ceetoh facility builds? The latter would have the broadest set of social and environmental benefits, and acknowledge a critical parallel role for the private sector, which is just now designing pre-commercial scale Ceetoh (cellulosic ethanol) production equipment. We realize this notion won't please the free market utopians; but, a mid-century climatic emergency, per the report of Sir Nicholas Stern , would cause adverse economic effects far worse than the Great Depression that preceded the original New Deal. Are you listening 2008 US Presidential candidates? Call it Future Deal if you like. Time to get started: even pioneer species like Bigtooth Aspen (leaf, as pictured) take 20 -30 years to be ready for harvest. Image credit: New York College at Cortland
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- Vanguard Homes Builds First WaterSense® Labeled Dwelling In USA: 20% More Water Efficient
- Ramsar Wetland Convention Meeting in Korea: Peat, Bogs And Poetry
- GreenBuild: Big Ass Fans
- Even My Dog Is Recycled
Careful what you ask for. You're more likely to get a massive nuclear program than anything else. That's what is likely to look like a plan-at-scale to a bureaucrat.
The obvious sustainable solution is renewable energy and electric cars.
To achieve this, we need a few new rules and laws, and a consistent comprehensive plan.
1 ) Set a standard voltage (220v 100a 3ph) for recharging a BEV with a common plug, then make all shopping malls install these in their parking areas.
2 ) Offer zero Tax on BEV car production for 5 years, while charging higher tax of fossil fuel cars (more on less efficient ones)
3 ) Commit to installing high capacity HVDC power transmission lines where needed.
4 ) Double taxes on fossil fuels, and place zero taxes on renewable energy for the next 5 years.
5 ) Identify renewable energy as wind, solar, wave, and geothermal.
6 ) Do not sign approval for even one new coal fired power plant.