most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
mehulkamdar said: "Come on, guys, the proverbial thousand mile journey begins with the first step. I used to work for a business that sold John Deere Gators to the Ar..." [read]

Soylent said: ""The point of subsidizing solar and wind electrical generation is to incentivize the creation of an industry with enough technological advances and..." [read]

Soylent said: ""It's only a matter of time before we see the rights to our rooftops being sold off much like mineral and oil rights for land currently are." ..." [read]

Ken said: ""Legend says that it has so many steps to make it impossible for someone to retrieve a coin if it is dropped into the well." That so called "legen..." [read]

jafraldo said: "Haha, you have to hand it to Brazil. They have guts saying that they're going to stop more pollution than the rest of the world by theoretically r..." [read]

Environmental Defense and DuPont Partner to Address Nanotech Risks

by Eric Kane, New York, NY on 03. 1.07
Science & Technology

nanotech.jpg Earlier this week, Environmental Defense and DuPont released a draft strategy that will enable firms that manufacture or use nanomaterials to evaluate and manage environmental risks. The six-step strategy is the product of a partnership that began in September 2005 to encourage the responsible development of nanotechnology-based products. The Nano Risk Framework establishes processes for companies to use to evaluate potential risks, determine staff roles, and gather information. Furthermore, it recommends the use of life cycle analysis to address material sourcing, workers’ exposure, and disposal. For those who are interested in contributing to the development of this framework, Environmental Defense and DuPont will be accepting comments from the public until March 30 at feedback@nanoriskframework.com. To view the Nano Risk Framework, click here.

Comments (1)

Great idea.

Conspicuous by their absence, is any mention of the US Federal Agencies: EPA or OSHA. Thinking ahead a bit, will Congress pull the nails out of the agency coffins in time to take advantage of what this partnership comes up with? Or, are we headed into an entirely different future space, where the stock market rewards those companies that properly manage risk and penalizes those who do not? The latter direction seems utterly improbable unless China stops serving as the dumping ground for high hazard , inefficient technology.

jump to top JL says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads