most popular:
VW's 282 MPG Car



most popular:
Vertical Gardening


th comments
M.Aloisius said: "A lot of people take the Keep And Open Mind mantra a wee bit too far. I say this can't work as described and this is a giant hoax like the ..." [read]

vertography said: "While I totally agree that the best option is to take a proper reusable bag shopping (or not use a bag if you only have a couple of items and don't..." [read]

Joey Shepp said: "Hi, I'm the founder of Green Maven, the original Green Search Engine. I use the term 'Green Search Engine' to refer to the results being fi..." [read]

said: "The solution to energy problems and climate change will be in many various alternative fuels, each with a smaller piece of the pie than petroleum h..." [read]

M.Aloisius said: "Actually if you're talking about thermal efficiency, there are gas turbines that can push 60% efficiency when waste heat is recovered to run a stea..." [read]

Applied Materials To Install 1.9 MW Solar Capacity

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 03.17.07
Business & Politics (news)

5229_5_applied_materials_rtp_chamber.jpg

Per the press release, Applied Materials, equipment supplier to the chip fab and SPV cell industries, has announced that it will install solar panels capable of generating 1.9 megawatts of power on the roofs of the buildings of it's Sunnyvale, California-based campus. When operational in 2008, Applied's new roof-top solar power generating system will provide about the same amount of electricity that would be consumed by 1,400 homes. That's bigger than Google's solar project. So, now who's greener? Image credit: Photo of used AM-made equipment by Fab Surplus

Comments (3)

First of all, mW = milliwatt (0,001 Watt) - the appropriate term is MW (1000 Watt). Second, it's more like 233 homes with the average of 10MWh /year for households in America (the press release states it will generate 2.330MWh/year).

But it's definately a good step! I think there's a good chance that corporate installations will continue to take a lead in the early adopters share.

jump to top Ewout [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

>the appropriate term is MW (1000 Watt).

wouldn't that be a mega watt ? as in million ?

jump to top tom says:

true, Tom, this time it was me not paying attention (which is a bad thing considering I was actually trying to tell what was wrong)... Anyway, the topic title was changed shortly after I posted, so I guess the whole post has become obsolete :o)

jump to top Ewout [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads