most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
mehulkamdar said: "Come on, guys, the proverbial thousand mile journey begins with the first step. I used to work for a business that sold John Deere Gators to the Ar..." [read]

Soylent said: ""The point of subsidizing solar and wind electrical generation is to incentivize the creation of an industry with enough technological advances and..." [read]

Soylent said: ""It's only a matter of time before we see the rights to our rooftops being sold off much like mineral and oil rights for land currently are." ..." [read]

Ken said: ""Legend says that it has so many steps to make it impossible for someone to retrieve a coin if it is dropped into the well." That so called "legen..." [read]

jafraldo said: "Haha, you have to hand it to Brazil. They have guts saying that they're going to stop more pollution than the rest of the world by theoretically r..." [read]

US Governor Plays 15-Year, $20 Million Dollar “Texas Hold ‘Em” Bet On Coal-To-Liquids Plant

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 02. 6.07
Business & Politics

the_game_of_choice.jpgAs reported in the Weatherford Texas Democrat, “Texas has one-upped the state of Illinois again in the battle to win FutureGen, the U.S. Department of Energy’s experimental mega-power plant…Gov. Rick Perry announced a $20 million funding commitment Monday, which significantly boosts Texas’ effort to win the federal gasification and carbon capture demonstration project”. Governor Perry has upped the ante against US Senator Barack Obama and his home State of Illinois, whose parallel interest in having the “FutureGen” we mentioned in a previous post. Apparently, the C02 captured from the prospective Texas FutureGen plant emissions would be sold for use in oil well injection -- to increase Texas oil production, presumably.

Our favorite quote from the article:-“As the global debate surrounding coal-fueled power plant emissions escalates, no other state in the nation is more cognizant of these issues than Texas.”

And our second favorite quote:- “Because of the tremendous work and talent our state has devoted to the FutureGen pursuit, Texas is positioned as a premiere authority in clean coal technology,” Who’d have thought it?

The entire article is certainly worth reading. You’ll find it here.

Image credit: We Do It All Vegas.

Comments (5)

Texas played harball to get the Superconducting Supercollider, but after they did, the site was found to be unbuildable, because of FIRE ANTS ! The entire project was scrapped, after millions of preliminary dollars being spent. Let's hope the spadework on this bid approaches a minimum level of competence.

jump to top rob says:

Ok so maybe I'm just looking for this, but it seems that whenever Texas gets mention on here, people act like its that one cousin...who's kinda slow....pulling a fast one and catching you off guard. Does everyone have that low of a expection for Texas?

=== authors' response follows ===
Speaking only for myself, because TX is running low on natural gas and oil, and coal and wind are the remaining best options, I'd be glad to see them get the CTL project...and more wind power incentives too. But CTL remains a long shot and should not be viewed as somehow canceling the more near term negatives of the currently proposed coal fired plants, which would lack the low emission qualities of CTL.

jump to top Aaron says:

Actually Rob, Bill Clinton pulled funding for the Supercollider project in texas after 2 billion (out of a projected 8.5 billion dollers) had already been spent on the project!

here's a great article about it.

http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=502

jump to top Lil' Hugger says:

I'm still pretty upset over Superconducting Supercollider project getting shut down. It would have been an amazing tool for science and to end it after 2 billion dollars had already been spent. What a sad mistake that was.

And it wasn't closed because of Ants. Well not that I've ever heard of and I live like 30+ miles from where it was going to be built.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_Supercollider

jump to top Aaron says:

Thanks Aaron, I intended to write that in my above post too.

According to the link to the article I attached in my previous post, it seems like funding was cancelled because it was going WAY over budget and the projected total cost kept going up and up.

It really is too bad though, it really would have pushed technological innovation in the U.S.

jump to top Lil' Hugger says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads