Catholic Bishops Send Climate Letter To US Congressional Leaders
by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 02. 9.07
Via: Catholic News Online, Less than a week following publication of the latest IPCC summary report, Bishop Thomas G Wenski of Orlando, Florida, chairman of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on International Policy, has sent a letter to US Congressional leaders, calling on them to "resist special interest groups and instead focus on "common ground for common action to advance the common good"...The Orlando bishop urged the Congress to "focus on three central priorities" - the poor, the pursuit of the common good and prudence...Rather than search for "economic, political or other narrow advantage", the Congress, the bishop said, has an obligation "to pass on the gift of God's creation to future generations without doing irreversible harm"". Image credit: Miami Young Church. The full letter send by Bishop Wenski is presented in the extended text of this post, as seen at this link to the US Conference of Catholic Bishops website. Catholics, your comments are welcome here.
February 7, 2007
At a time of growing and overdue attention to the challenges of global climate change, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops welcomes your leadership on this issue which literally affects the future of God’s creation. The just released report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has outlined more clearly and more compelling than ever before the case for serious and urgent action to address the potential consequences of climate change as well as highlighting the dangers and costs of inaction.
As chairman of the Bishops’ International Policy Committee, I urge you and your colleagues to focus on three central priorities in the debate and decisions to come:
* The practical demands of prudence which require wise action now to address problems that will grow in their magnitude and consequences;
* The pursuit of the common good rather than the demands of narrow interests;
* A priority for the poor who will bear the greatest burdens and pay the greatest price for the consequences and costs of climate change.
We are encouraged by the increasing signs of serious attention to climate change. President Bush addressed this matter in his State of the Union speech. Congress has begun a series of important hearings, and a variety of proposals are being put forward. We hope this will be a time for our nation to come together across partisan, ideological and interest groups lines to address the moral, human and environmental dimensions of this growing challenge that faces all of humanity.
In Global Climate Change: A Plea for Dialogue, Prudence and the Common Good, the Catholic bishops of the United States insisted: “At its core, global climate change is not about economic theory or political platforms, nor about partisan advantage or interest group pressures. It is about the future of God's creation and the one human family. It is about protecting both "the human environment" and the natural environment.1 It is about our human stewardship of God's creation and our responsibility to those who come after us.” I enclose a copy of our statement, Global Climate Change: A Plea for Dialogue, Prudence and the Common Good.
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops seeks to offer a constructive contribution to this timely and important national debate. We participate not as climate experts or as scientists, but rather as pastors and teachers who fear that the moral and human dimensions of these decisions will be overwhelmed by political, economic or ideological pressures. We ask you to take steps to address three major themes drawn from Catholic Social Teaching and our pastoral experience:
A Priority for the Poor: We are deeply concerned that the poor and vulnerable in our country and around the world will have little or no voice in this vital discussion. Their needs and burdens are likely to be ignored or overwhelmed by more powerful forces. Poor families and children, vulnerable workers, and farmers will likely be most impacted by climate change and bear the greatest burdens as we address its causes and consequences. The poor have the fewest resources and capacity to escape the costs of climate change. We all know too well who is left behind and who pays the greatest price when disaster, floods or droughts occur. The impact on poor communities and nations require priority attention as proposals for action are shaped and assessed.
The Pursuit of the Common Good: The challenge of global climate change is a pre-eminent example of how our debate and decisions should reflect the pursuit of the common good, rather than the search for economic, political or other narrow advantage. Our obligation to pass on the gift of God’s creation to future generations without doing irreversible harm is but one aspect of the demands of the common good. We urge you to resist and restrain predictable interest group pressures and narrow appeals. Instead, we urge to you to help build up common ground for common action to advance the common good.
The Practice of Prudence: The IPCC report makes clear that “the warming of the climate is unequivocal” and that “continued greenhouse gas emissions at or above current rates would cause further warming and induce many changes in the global climate system during the 21st century that would very likely be larger than those observed during the 20th century.” (Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, IPCC WGI Fourth Assessment Report, pp. 3 and 10, available at http://www.ipcc.ch). The traditional virtue of prudence suggests that we do not have to know with absolute certainty everything that is happening with climate change to know that something seriously harmful is occurring. Therefore, it is better to act now than wait until the problem gets worse and the remedies more costly. This precautionary principle leads us to act now to avoid the worst consequences of waiting. Prudence sometimes keeps us from acting precipitously. In this case, it requires us to act with urgency and seriousness.
The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops will work with you and others to address global climate change within this framework and on these three principles. We do so with modesty and respect. While no one has easy answers, we ask you to help define and refine what prudence and the pursuit of the common good require. We seek your help in lifting up and focusing on how climate change will affect the “least among us” — the poor, the vulnerable and the voiceless in our country and around the world. We particularly seek your leadership in shaping responses that respect and protect the lives and the dignity of poor families and children.
We believe the moral measure of debate and decisions on climate change will be how we act with prudence to protect God’s creation, advance the “common good,” and mitigate the ways that climate change and its remedies burden the poor and the vulnerable.
On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I thank you for your leadership on this very important and urgent moral priority.
Sincerely yours,
Most Reverend Thomas G. Wenski
Bishop of Orlando
Chairman, Committee on International Policy

















I am happy to see that the Catholic Church (I'm Catholic) is speaking out about harming God's creation.
The Church doesn't believe this, but THEY are the primary culprits of Global Warming. The primary problem with Global Warming is overpopulation, We are overpopulated because of the farming practices of the Churches coupled with their attitude of reproducing without limit.
More people equals more consumers of oil, wood, food, animals and natural resources. We have to limit our population growth, the church is against this.
They are fools.
Amen! I am definitely a non-religious person, but I've never felt prouder to be baptized a Catholic.
Oh gosh. Overpopulation is to blame???!!! It is such a pity that so many people form foundationless opinions all too easily - please dont be offended, but you really do need to check and have some statistics to back up such statements, before making sweeping comments like that! :-)
The fact is, a huge amount (approximately 95% I would estimate, but I don't have the figures at hand so i won't make sweeping statements!) of the world's population is from the so called developed countries, which however have only about 5 or 10% of the world's population.
In other words: (most of) the countries that have the largest populations (and largest population growths) do NOT contribute all that much, per capita, to pollution. Thus, it is an inaccurate statement to blame it on overpopulation!
(Make no mistake: I fully acknowledge that many so called 3rd world countries ARE also doing things that hurt the environment; just that, as a quantitative measurement, it doesn't even come close to that of the 1st world.)
This world can support a much larger population than it now does; the only requirement is that we learn to distribute resources equally. E.g., there is NOT a food scarcity in the world; instead it is a very unequal DISTRIBUTION of the world's food, togetehr with wrong economic and trade practices of the more powerful countries, that cause some countries to have starvation. The same applies to many of the supposed "scarcities" of whatever resources. Overpopulation is NOT really a problem by itself; instead, the real problem is lack of fair treatment (worldwide) of one's fellow human being, on an individual level as well as a larger level - and it's good to see that the Bishop's letter does allude to that sort of thing too.
Thanks
I think that YOU need to check YOUR facts Fernando. For instance, the world may very well support 12 Billion PEOPLE, but at what costs? Something has to give way to make room for those Billions more, and usually it's animal wildlife. The 6.5 Billion people NOW are pushing animals into extinction NOW, and when we get Billions more, they will no longer be competing with the extinct animals for dwindling resources, but with each other, not just for the Oil that we burn for transportation, but for everything else.
Look at these so-called Third World Countries that you say are not polluters liike we are....from what I understand they drive cars and motorcycles just like the First World countries do. They use oil for to power their farm equipment just like the US does. They also are building coal-fire plants for...who? Who do you think? They are also drilling for oil for who? Who do you think? They are also breeding slave workers to make toys overseas for...?
When you talk about "equal food distribution" are you including the other animals that also rely on food to live? Or did you mean just the Billions of humans and the hell with every other species that isn't human?
I don't think that you are (just like everyone else). And for that reason this world is reaching a breaking point.
Population may eventually be a problem as the carrying capacity of the plant is reached, however, carbon emissions (which is the real problem with global climate change) is more directly and immediately linked to prosperity and wealth of a country. If you've seen An Inconvenient Truth, Gore clearly shows that the U.S. is the largest emitter of carbon and the EU is second. China and India however have about 3x larger population and considerably less carbon emissions.
Overall I think to blame the church for global climate change and pollution is misguided. The largest populations aren't even catholic! (again China and India) I think that pollution comes about mostly through what John Paul the Great called a materialistic consumerist culture (ie do you really need such a huge gas guzzler?). I am happy to see that the Catholic church as well as many other faiths have taken up the call and have begun to demand change.
Hi! I thought you and your readers might be interested in some post-Easter news about Pope Benedict XVI...
The Pope's car is being auctioned off to raise money for Habitat for Humanity:
www.buyacarvideos.com/popecar.htm
The bidding is already more than $200,000! Personally, I think this is a really fun and creative way to raise
money. The auction goes until April 14th if you and your readers want to check it out.