most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Yoav Binyamini said: ""The target price of 20 to 25 thousand euros (US $27 - 34 thousand) puts the Will in the class of affordable electric vehicles" Why not 'Ta..." [read]

Robert McGibbon said: "It's more accurate to say that it runs on lemmons AND zinc. The zinc anode gets depleted. A non renewable resource so to speak...." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

barry said: "Flying seattle to galapagos dumps 12,000 pounds of greenhouse gases into our future...per person. There is no way anyone can do that level of clima..." [read]

The Economist Discovers Geo-engineering

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 01.16.07
Science & Technology

geo-engineering

The Economist magazine looks at geo-engineering: the the magic technical fix that will solve global warming. As they note, the idea has been around for ages; a 1965 report "nonchalantly proposed dealing with the results by dumping vast quantities of reflective particles into the oceans, to increase the amount of sunlight reflected into space." Other more recent ideas (oft discussed in TreeHugger) include "seeding the skies with compounds to encourage the formation of low-lying, cooling clouds; building a giant sun-shade in space; and dumping iron in the oceans to encourage the growth of algae that would take in carbon when alive and trap it in on the sea floor when dead." and "the most promising idea may be to spray tiny sulphate particles into the upper atmosphere, where they will reflect incoming sunlight. Nature has already done the proof-of-concept work: volcanic eruptions spew such particles into the air, and the cooling effect is well documented." They do come to the appropriate conclusion: "You can look at climate change as an experiment which mankind has―to its horror―found itself performing on the planet. To start a second experiment, in the hopes of counteracting the first, would be, to put it mildly, rather risky." ::Economist and see earlier ::Worldchanging and ::New York Times

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads