th comments
blindflacker said: "Great for bike shop owners/employees or bike messengers, but I doubt many employers would go thru the hassle for a standard commuter. As I take it ..." [read]

Anthony said: "I manufacture solar window fans with a relatively very cheap manufacturing price. Feel free and welcome to email me if you are interest to purchase..." [read]

Raiyn said: "@ Steven The article says "an unnamed private sector partner" This clearly means that the information either wasn't provided to the author..." [read]

thespyofcharles said: "innovative... nice... but question: I thought a weakness of PV's were that they only generate as much power as the area of the panel ..." [read]

gdavis said: "Try a masonry stove. Rob Roy of Earthwood Building School in NY has a couple of great books Mortgage Free! and Underground Living. He uses 2-3 co..." [read]

TreeHugger Picks: Prototypical Energy Types for the Future

by Collin Dunn, Corvallis, OR, USA on 01. 5.07
TH Exclusives (top fives)

th-picks-prototypical-energy.jpg

Following up with our peek at the future with some stunning car prototypes, we gaze into the crystal ball of energy production methods and ideas that have the potential to make the future a much greener place.

1) Wave power has garnered lots of attention as the next big thing in renewable energy.
2) Hydrogen has been the darling eco-energy of the future for awhile, but has yet to
3) Wind power, and specifically offshore wind power, has the potential to power the entire US.
4) Biofuels, like those derived from switch grass, can help wean the world off its overindulgence in oil.
5) Solar power just keeps getting more efficient, and it works great where the sun shines and as a good alternative for where the wind doesn't blow.

Comments (5)

It's probably best if we drop hydrogen as a goal. The conversion losses are too great and the energy density is too low.

Much better to go with electrons and use batteries, ultra-capacitors, etc. for storage. Plus we get to use the existing distribution system for electrons (the electric grid) rather than spending billions on creating a new infrastructure.

For more, see Dr. Ulf Bossel's paper here:
http://www.inspiringgreenleadership.com/downloads/FutureIsElectronsNotHydrogen.pdf


I don't think hydrogen storage has had much time to adapt.

I know that hydrogen as volume has a low density, however per gram it has the highest of coal, petrol, methane.

Ohh so you know by volume coal has the best energy. So I guess we should use that right?

jump to top Shadow7988@gmail.com says:

See twenty hydrogen myths by Physicist A Lovins


http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid171.php#20H2Myths

jump to top Steve Zorbas says:

Always thanks for your kindly news letter

jump to top Kunkiw Lee says:

Shadow7988, actually, I think uranium packs more power per pound than coal.

jump to top eas says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads