th comments
Lori said: "Regardless of whether or not this "soup" exists, the fact is that we need to all be aware and responsible for how we treat this planet. We have to..." [read]

Truespeak said: "Wind power works. Anyone who says it isn't perfect is correct, but no power generation is perfect, and we still use them all. I'm in the US,..." [read]

said: "Golly, Terra pass tells you how much carbon you need to offset. What a coincidence that they also SELL carbon "credits." Kind of like the oil compa..." [read]

karla said: "hey like this website I'm making a project about going green , I need to put how people can go green can you help me..." [read]

Desmond Sharpe said: "I was talking to my sister in Canada and she told me that the Mennonite religious farms up were she lives are leading the way in electicity generat..." [read]

Ford Airstream Plug-In Hydrogen Fuel Cell Concept

by Kristi Piziks, Detroit, USA on 01. 9.07
Cars & Transportation

ford-airstream-d01.jpg

Ford is playing to our space-age side with their futuristic crossover concept, the Airstream.

Ford designers looked to the iconic design of the Airstream trailers and the optimistic future of 2001: A Space Odyssey to create this plug-in hydrogen fuel cell concept vehicle unveiled at the 2007 North American International Auto show on Sunday.

The Ford Airstream concept is powered by a plug-in hydrogen hybrid fuel-cell system called HySeries Drive. Interestingly, the hydrogen fuel cell is not the main power source. The Airstream runs on an electric motor powered by lithium-ion batteries which are charged by plugging them in a standard wall socket, and the fuel cell simply acts as an on-board “generator” to recharge the batteries when needed while in transit.

In pure electric mode the Airstream Concept can travel 25 miles before the fuel cell begins to operate to recharge the 336-volt lithium-ion battery pack. After that the hydrogen-power cell kicks in and can take the vehicle up to an additional 280 miles.

ford-airstream-d02.jpg

The fuel cell on the HySeries Drive system has a few advantages over others: It weighs about half what any current fuel cell does, so it will be more efficient on the vehicle it powers, and it costs significantly less to make. Also, current fuel cells don’t do well when the mercury dips below freezing, but the HySeries fuel cell can operate in the dead of winter.

While the Airstream will never be made, the HySeries Drive technology is currently on the road in a Ford Edge prototype, which was created with partial funding from the U. S. Department of Energy. Is it reasonable to expect to see it available to consumers in the future? Who knows. Ford seems more in love with the actual design of the concept than the technology. In fact, I suspect the hydrogen technology may merely be a way to make their futuristic concept even more kitchy (space ships are supposed to run on hydrogen, right?)

When I see HySeries Drive at the dealership, maybe then I’ll be excited. As I always feel about concept vehicles: “If you think the style and technology are so great, go ahead and make something you can sell me.”

Comments (19)

Concept cars are like the supermodels of the fashion world. No one expects to actually own those cars/clothes, but they may be attracted to the brand as the creativity chord is played.

jump to top JL says:

I hear ya, JL, but I feel that way about the fashion industry, too!

jump to top Kristi says:

Money well spent (sarcasm). hehe

Hydrogen fuel cells are energy negative. It consumes more energy to create and store hydrogen than is yielded in the vehicles. I get concerned for our well being if everybody buys the hydrogen lie and we are further set back from positive change (since each change in our collective conscience can happen too slowly (in terms of conviction) for what is at stake with global warming and the fight for the last drops). Making a change towards hydrogen, then a change away from hydrogen to a better solution (there, of course, are definite positives to hydrogen) will take too long. We just don't have the time or the resources. We need a better solution today. Change can happen quickly. They (who is this they business? =) talk like it can't, but if there is a profit to follow and a consensus on benefits, we would be amazed how quickly change can happen. It freaks me out when I hear discussion and propaganda about the timeline of changes we need to undergo, when it is presented like integration would take decades. That is all part of a campaign of confusion to stall the inevitable. Anytime an a economy undergoes change, there can be an opportunity for profit and growth, the only setback currently in integrating change, is of course the shift in what pocket the profit will be flowing toward. That is the only true cause for delay. Intentional stalling from the people in power and building confusion with this fuel cell business to divert attention. It is like a magician's trick. look over here so I can fool you.

i don't know why i just went off. sorry. =)

I got myself a bicycle this week. It felt good. Yeah, I like clean air. I wish i could breathe the air of 200 years ago, i wonder if i would notice a difference in taste, smell or nourishment.

jump to top Beeeee says:

I want one! I want one!
Why don´t they make this for market?

jump to top tony says:

Great article!

jump to top Steven says:

Take a deep breath Beeeeeeeee - change of anykind is better than the damage being done to our planet now. That being said - I thought this was a great article.

jump to top Mark D says:

Why bother covering concept cars? Concentrating on the real world is time better spent.

jump to top Joe says:

"Why bother covering concept cars?"

Because they matter in many ways. They can indicate where the cutting edge is. What direction companies are interested in. Many technologies are first debuted there before they make it to consumer models. etc.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Mark D - how is any change better when it makes things worse. Hydrogen fuel cells are engergy negative, that mean more fossil fuels will be used.

jump to top James Barker [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Hydrogen is an energy storage unit.

So is ethanol.

So is batteries:)

So is methane.

In a way so is Fossil Fuels.

So well, I'm not against hydrogen. Do I think batteries are a better way to go. Seems Tesla is proving it.

jump to top Shadow7988@gmail.com says:

thanks beeeeeee

jump to top zaxxon [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Despite looking like something out of The Jetson’s – it’d be great if Ford did finally realize that fuel economy (through electric and plug-in-electric hybrids) is the true Way Forward. But this offering is still a concept car that will likely never hit the road – and won’t do anything to address Ford’s financial woes or the consumer demand for fuel efficient vehicles

We all know increasing fuel efficiency is the direction automakers need to head – so let’s get past the hype of a handful of concept vehicles and look at what they are doing with the rest of their fleet. Overall average fuel economy from the Big 6 is worse today that it was 10 years ago and Ford is consistently at the bottom of the pack. They are still fighting tooth-and-nail against increasing fuel economy regulations, suing states that try to limit greenhouse gas emissions, and in December argued before the Supreme Court that carbon from tailpipe emissions was not even a pollutant.

Several companies are already doing plug-in conversions to the Ford Escape Hybrid – and Ford doesn’t need to start from scratch (or take cues from Sci-Fi movies) to lead the industry in fuel economy. There are hundreds of cities, counties, utility districts and private fleets clamoring for plug-in hybrid vehicles. Ford could be developing prototype conversions of their Escape Hybrid and making test-fleets available to these anxious early-adopters – while building public confidence in this technology and laying the groundwork for mass production.

If Ford wants to see my support they would:

• Stop lobbying against rises in fuel economy (CAFÉ) standards
• Drop the lawsuits against states like California who are trying to regulate greenhouse gases
• Commit to leading the industry in fuel economy across their entire fleet.

I’ve been working with the Freedom From Oil Campaign to make automakers honestly prioritize fuel economy and move beyond oil – check out what we do at :

http://www.FreedomFromOil.org

jump to top Matt says:

Why do US auto designers think their concept vehicles need to look like something from the Jetson's cartoon.

Even for a concept this four-wheel wreck looks beyond stupid.

Plug-in electric hybrids with a 50-100 mile range is the only future for big US automakers. But as history shows they'll realize this undeniable truth about four years too later.

jump to top mliving says:

Just a friendly reminder from a car nut: The automobile companies are in the business of selling automoblies, not restoring our environment. That's our job. Spend wisely.

P.S. I still like the VW: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/09/1964_vw_bus_get.php

jump to top Tim says:

I'm sorry, it's just flat out ugly. It seems as though they make these cars to fail from the get go. They don't want the majority of the world screaming for these cars. They know they are on to something with the technology and then they screw it up with their designs to keep them off the market do to lack of interest. Later, trying to blame the technology for why the cars didn't gain enough appeal.

Born and raised here, I consider myself an american who deep down truly loves his country, but as the Vapors' once sang, "I'm turning Japanese, I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so." The Honda and Toyota companies are the Real John Wayne's, being the only ones really gutsy enough to try and show us something that we can really sit in.

jump to top BWhitson says:

Artistically it's great!!! That's about it though!!!

jump to top Crystal says:

How is a vehicle that can only do 305 miles of any benefit to us? Most people drive into the cities for work and some travel a lot farther than 305 miles. Ford knows that better millage out of gasoline engines is possible so why not just incorporate it into existing models or future models. In 1933 Charles Nelson Pogue made headlines when he drove a 1932 Ford V8, 200 miles on a gallon of gas during a demonstration conducted by The Ford Motor Companies in Winnipeg, Manitoba using his super-carb system. US Patent # 2,026,798. What about modifications that have also increased the mpg of even the biggest gas guzzlers? I think it's all just PR. GM had a battery cell vehicle, the EV1 that they refused to sell to anyone and when the lease was up they simply crushed them so that no one could own them. If Bush and the automakers are serious then stop erecting walls every times someone comes up with an ingenious idea for reducing fuel consumption.

Alot of you are quite unhinged. So what other conspiracies do you all subscibe to?

Interesting concept. All I know is that the people designing this stuff are much more brilliant than any of us are and will do more with regard the environment and providing a superior product than any clown (including me) posting on an internet board.

As far as air 200 years ago guy...the air smelled like horse manure since that is what moved everything everywhere at that time.

jump to top Brian says:

Yes, spend the time and money on REAL cars instead of all those vaporware stuff

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads