th comments
amethystshadows said: "I also live in Maine, in a late 1800s house, around 1900 square feet. We have a woodstove in the basement, with air ducts to the first floor. We ..." [read]

Willy Bio said: "James, I don't necessarily disagree with you. But right now, our culture is akin to an alcoholic who thinks that simply cutting back a bit..." [read]

Doug said: "But doesn't all that movement of the wood keep you warmer? :)..." [read]

Eddy De Clercq said: "Question of course what happens with the recycled stuff. As mentioned in this <a href="http://www.grumpyoldman.be/green-money/" rel="nofollow..." [read]

Andrew said: "wow, oops. I usually end up riding on the sidewalk through there. It never even registered that that bike lane is special...I'm so spoiled in Bou..." [read]

Firewall Philanthropy: Blind-Eye Denialism In A Changing Climate

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 01.15.07
Business & Politics

kids.flare.jpg

We all love it when the wealthy give to a good cause that government can't seem to come to grips with. Or, when a self-directed creative genius wins a MacArthur Fellowship. Such well-targeted giving provides inspiration and hope beyond all headlines. So, it is disconcerting when we learn that philanthropic money, well spent, and for worthy cause, is found to originate from investment in corporations that have been contributing to serious environmental and health problems. Such is the example given of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which, according to the LA Times investigative piece just published, has invested in corporations that fouled the nests of the very people the Foundation's work intends to benefit. Rather than excerpt at length from the LAT, we will rely on a photo to symbolize. The picture is of an oil well gas flare in Nigeria. Throughout the Niger Delta, oil well, by-product gases are openly burned to avoid asphyxiation and fire hazard, producing, by one account, 70 million tons of CO2 annually. It is considered uneconomic to capture and sell the gas as fuel. So, up it goes. Nigeria supplies much oil to western nations, and the added climate impact of flaring is not counted when we calculate the climate footprint of our personal vehicles.

Thus, we may feel double-blinded by a philanthropy that enables continuation of the flaring through its investment choices, made, apparently, without stipulation. On the otherhand, the choice to flare was made decades ago, and is not the Gates Foundation's to re-make. Many other shareholders have a stake. Paralysis by analysis of such convoluted issues can be avoided by open dialog, which the LA Times has enabled through its investigative journalism, and by a "who owns the problem" analysis that anyone is capable of. The bottom line for this writer: use less oil and oil-related products. Image credit: Climate Law. Writing done in Movable Type, under Mac OS.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads